Greenpeace Africa responds to BBC investigation revealing Shell knew of Niger Delta pipeline pollution risks and kept pumping

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

Wednesday, June 3Internal Shell documents obtained by the BBC show that Shell continued operating the Nembe Creek Trunk Line in Nigeria for years while it knew the pipeline was causing widespread pollution, overriding warnings from its own technical executives and its own operating standards. Sections of the pipeline were classified “red” under Shell’s own rules, a status requiring immediate shutdown. Shell kept the oil flowing.

Responding to the revelations, Sherelee Odayar, Oil and Gas Campaigner at Greenpeace Africa, said:

“Shell saw the danger in its own files and chose profit over people. Its engineers raised the alarm. Its own standards demanded a shutdown. Its executives kept the oil flowing and worried about legal privilege while the rivers of the Niger Delta turned to poison.”

“This is wilful neglect. The communities of Bille lost their fishing grounds to a company that weighed their lives against its margins and decided the margins came first.”

“Shell banked the profit for decades while Bille paid in lost fishing grounds and ruined health. Under the Polluter Pays Principle, that debt comes due. Shell must pay to clean the water, restore the land, and compensate the people whose livelihoods it destroyed. Justice for the petitioners means Shell answers for every barrel spilt and every life upended.”

Greenpeace Africa stands with the Bille community and every Niger Delta family demanding accountability. The verdict the people of the Delta deserve is simple. The polluter must pay, and in full.

ENDS

China: ‘Heartless’ ban on Tiananmen Mothers visiting cemetery signals escalating repression 

Source: Amnesty International –

Responding to reports that Chinese authorities have barred the mothers of protesters killed in the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown from visiting their loved ones’ graves on this week’s anniversary of the atrocity, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director Sarah Brooks said:

“Banning the relatives of people killed in the Tiananmen crackdown from visiting their loved ones’ graves is a heartless act by the Chinese authorities.

“The Tiananmen Mothers were not previously blocked from cemetery visits on the 4 June anniversary, and it is deeply troubling that this year the suppression of Tiananmen commemoration appears to be escalating – reflecting the government’s deep-seated insecurity about people’s demands for accountability.

“For years the Chinese authorities have sought to erase the public’s collective memory of the bloody events of 4 June 1989, but this latest prohibition is an attempt to stamp out even the personal memories of the victims’ families.

“This suggests an approach that is increasingly hardline and devoid of compassion. To continually deny the truth about the Tiananmen crackdown is abhorrent; but to deny relatives the ability to mourn their dead shows another level of cruelty.

“The Chinese authorities must be held accountable for the grave human rights violations perpetrated on 4 June 1989, and families must be allowed to commemorate those killed 37 years ago simply for exercising their right to protest.”

Belgium: Amnesty International joins complaint against FedEx for unlawful arms transit to Israel

Source: Amnesty International –

Amnesty International has today added its name to a complaint filed against FedEx Belgium alleging the unlawful transit of arms, including parts for F-35 fighter jets which have been used extensively by Israel during its ongoing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip.

The human rights organization has joined a coalition of civil society organizations, including Vredesactie, Ligue des droits humains, and Coordination nationale d’action pour la paix et la démocratie, which filed a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor of Liège in Belgium’s Wallonia region, against FedEx Belgium. The company is the Belgian subsidiary of the US shipping giant.

Under laws governing Wallonia, a federal region with legislative power, FedEx Belgium was required to obtain a transit licence from local authorities for the shipment, which it failed to do. The transfer of such arms without this license is a criminal offence under Belgian law.

“F-35 fighter jets are the most advanced combat aircraft in the Israeli Air Force, which has caused widespread death and destruction, wiping out entire generations of Palestinian families and reducing most of the Gaza Strip to rubble. Israel’s ongoing genocide demands constant re-supply of weapons; and all states, including Belgium, have a duty to prevent and punish genocide and not to contribute to Israel’s unlawful occupation of the Palestinian territory which requires also immediately halting any transfer or transit of arms that may be used to commit crimes under international law,” said Carine Thibaut, Director of Amnesty International (Francophone) Belgium.

In October 2024, a shipment subject to the US International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) was transported by FedEx from the Hill Air Force Base in Utah to the Nevatim military airbase in Israel, according to information available on FedEx’s website.

In June 2025, statements made by FedEx indicated that “certain FedEx flight routes have been reconfigured at short notice for operational reasons” owing to the closure of Israeli airspace during the so-called “12 Day War” between Iran and Israel. As a result, “certain goods subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulations may have passed through Liège unintentionally”.

The cargo was unloaded at Liège airport, then transported by road to Cologne airport in Germany before continuing on to Israel.

Violations of international law

There have been further media reports of suspected illegal transits of shipments at Liège Airport since then, indicating a failure to enforce local laws.

“We are concerned that a pattern is emerging where Belgian and Walloon authorities are not putting mechanisms in place to effectively regulate the transit of arms. By bringing this case, we hope to stop the further unlawful transit of arms through Belgium to Israel and secure accountability. It’s not acceptable that multinationals like FedEx can ignore the rules when it suits them. They are not above the law,” said Carine Thibaut.

It’s not acceptable that multinationals like FedEx can ignore the rules when it suits them. They are not above the law.

Carine Thibaut, Director of Amnesty International (Francophone) Belgium

International law prohibits all states from transferring weapons to any party to an armed conflict where there is a clear risk that such transfers could contribute to serious violations of international humanitarian law. The International Court of Justice’s July 2024 Advisory Opinion concluded that states have an obligation not to assist in maintaining Israel’s unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory.

States that continue to transfer arms to Israel are acting in contravention of their obligations under the Geneva Conventions, and for those that have ratified it, the Arms Trade Treaty.

Amnesty International’s research also shows that Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed Martin) continues to supply and service F-16s and the growing fleet of F-35 combat aircraft which has been used extensively in the bombardment of the occupied Gaza Strip.

Companies manufacturing and exporting arms also have a responsibility to respect human rights and international humanitarian law, including by conducting heightened human rights due diligence throughout their value chains to ensure the arms exported are not used to commit grave abuses that may amount to international crimes.

“This case comes at a time of renewed pressure on EU governments and companies to move beyond words of condemnation to actions which are essential to bring an end to Israel’s ongoing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, its unlawful occupation of the whole Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and its cruel system of apartheid against all Palestinians whose rights it controls. Human dignity is not a commodity. States, companies and many others must end their lethal addiction to economic gains and profits at all costs,” said Carine Thibaut.

Background

In 2024, the Walloon authorities suspended licences for the export of explosive powder to Israel, citing the International Court of Justice ruling of 26 January 2024 which found a plausible risk of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The authorities also cited the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza and subsequently banned the transit of weapons to Israel through Liège and Charleroi airports.

Another case was also opened by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office and is the subject of a judicial investigation.

Amnesty International approached FedEx Belgium for comment and received the following statement from a spokesperson for the company: “FedEx is committed to complying with applicable laws and regulations. We do not ship weapons or ammunition internationally and have put in place strict screening procedures to prevent such shipments.”

Amnesty International calls on all states to impose a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel. This should include all arms or equipment or technology or parts that risk enabling Israel to continue its genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, as well as its unlawful occupation and system of apartheid, including policing and surveillance equipment.

Press Arrangements for IAEA Board of Governors Meeting, 8-12 June 2026

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors will convene its regular June meeting at the Agency’s headquarters at 10:00 CEST on Monday, 8 June, in Board Room C, Building C, 4th floor, in the Vienna International Centre (VIC). 

Board discussions are expected to include, among others: Annual Report for 2025; strengthening of the Agency’s technical cooperation activities: Technical Cooperation Report for 2025; Report of the Programme and Budget Committee; Safeguards Implementation Report for 2025; application of safeguards in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Syrian Arab Republic; implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement and relevant provisions of the United Nations Security Council resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran; nuclear safety, security and safeguards in Ukraine; transfer of the nuclear materials in the context of AUKUS and its safeguards in all aspects under the NPT; designation of members to serve on the Board in 2026–2027; and representation of other organizations at the seventieth (2026) regular session of the General Conference.

The Board of Governors meeting is closed to the press. 

IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi will open the meeting with an introductory statement, which will be released to journalists after delivery and posted on the IAEA website.  

Press Conference 

Director General Grossi is expected to hold a press conference at 12:30 CEST on Monday, 8 June, in the Press Room of the M building. 

A live video stream of the press conference will be available. The IAEA will provide video footage of the press conference and the Director General’s opening statement here and will make photos available on Flickr.  

Photo Opportunity 

There will be a photo opportunity with the IAEA Director General and the Chair of the Board, Ambassador Ian David Grainge Biggs of Australia, before the start of the Board meeting, on 8 June at 10:00 CEST in Board Room C, in the C building in the VIC. 

Press Working Area 

The Press Room of the M building’s ground floor will be available as a press working area, starting from 09:00 CEST on 8 June.

Accreditation

All journalists interested in covering the meeting in person – including those with permanent accreditation – are requested to inform the IAEA Press Office of their plans. Journalists without permanent accreditation must send copies of their passport and press ID to the IAEA Press Office by 14:00 CEST on Friday, 5 June. 

We encourage those journalists who do not yet have permanent accreditation to request it at UNIS Vienna

Please plan your arrival to allow sufficient time to pass through the VIC security check. 

Global Ocean Protection Will Fail Without Human Rights at Its Core, Greenpeace Report Warns

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

Amsterdam, Netherlands – Greenpeace International launched a new report warning that the global target to protect at least 30% of the world’s oceans and other vital ecosystems by 2030 is on a path to failure, unless governments place human rights at the centre of marine conservation, today.

The report, “Global Ocean Justice Now: Making the Case for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Marine Conservation, is founded in long-standing collaboration with impacted communities. Ecosystems managed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities tend to be healthier, more biodiverse, and more resilient than surrounding areas with different governance. Yet, the report documents how communities are being pushed out, ignored, and actively harmed by state-sanctioned industrial developments and extractive industries. By consistently prioritising corporate profit and extractive industries, and by starving community-led conservation of critical support, governments are fundamentally failing to meet their international commitments.

Nichanan Tanthanawit, Global Project Lead, Greenpeace Ocean Justice Campaign said: “Too many governments are treating the 30×30 targets like a numbers game. You cannot claim to protect the ocean while excluding the very communities who have protected these ecosystems for generations. The science is already clear: oceans are healthier where communities have rights, power, and stewardship.” 

The report is being launched as world leaders begin the six-month countdown to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s COP17 in Yerevan, Armenia, where for the first time, countries will take stock of the stay of play of implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. COP17 offers a critical window for course correction, where world leaders must accelerate efforts to recognise Indigenous Peoples and local communities’ rights on the ground as well as their key role in nature protection and management. At its core, the report exposes the rise of so-called “paper parks”: protected areas that exist on maps but offer little real-world protection, and non-inclusive conservation tools that are collecting dust on a shelf and are not implemented in practice.

This failure, the report shows, is structural. Governments consciously choose to routinely overlook the most time-tested form of ocean stewardship in human history: the knowledge, governance systems, and daily practices of Indigenous Peoples and local communities who have sustained coastal ecosystems for generations. Instead, by displacing those communities to make room for industrial projects described as “national development,” the ecological damage mounts and the biodiversity targets slip further out of reach.

Tanthanawit added: “Development cannot continue to be defined only through top-down policies,”  “Across the world, coastal communities are already showing the will and leadership to move development and conservation forward on their own terms. Without meaningful participation, 30×30 risks becoming just another number on paper.” 

From industrial salmon farming in Patagonia, to fishmeal factories in West Africa, to sand mining in Sri Lanka and mega-port developments in Southern Thailand, the report exposes this growing contradiction: governments are promising ocean protection internationally while enabling ecological destruction domestically. But communities are not victims –  Indigenous Peoples and local communities are the architects of some of the world’s most effective marine protection systems.

Mamadou Kaly Ba, Campaigner, Greenpeace Africa said: “Senegal’s coastal communities are facing an unprecedented crisis driven by industrial overfishing, fishmeal and fish oil production, pollution, and offshore oil and gas expansion, all of which threaten our marine ecosystems, food security, and traditional livelihoods. Yet across our coastline, communities are proving that sustainable and community-led marine conservation works when local people are empowered and included in decision-making. We urgently need stronger protection for small-scale fisheries, greater recognition of community rights, and a phase out of fishmeal and fish oil production if we are to secure a just and sustainable future for Senegal’s ocean and coastal communities.”

 Anita Perera, Campaigner, Greenpeace South Asia said: “From severe environmental degradation and external development pressures to a recent catastrophic shipping disaster that dumped over 1,600 tonnes of plastic into South Asian waters, the communities in Mannar have withstood a continuous ecological onslaught. Yet, through unyielding resistance, they fought their way to a landmark Presidential decree requiring local consent before any energy project can proceed. When frontline communities assert their right to self-determination, they don’t just protect biodiversity – they reshape legal frameworks.”

Greenpeace is calling on governments to urgently implement the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF) and the 30×30 protection target. To do so, global efforts must prioritise redirecting conservation funding to community-led stewardship, halting destructive industrial activity in sensitive marine areas, and centering the rights and food security of Indigenous and coastal communities at every step.

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

Download the full report.

Executive summary of the report.

Photos available in the Greenpeace Media Library.

Governments falling 90 percent short of climate adaptation finance needs, Oxfam warns ahead of Bonn climate talks

Source: Oxfam –

Governments are falling 90 percent short of adaptation finance targets and leaving people in climate-vulnerable communities drastically under-equipped to cope with the devastating impacts of climate change, Oxfam warns ahead of Bonn climate talks (8-18 June).  

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as of 2024, governments mobilized $32 billion in public adaptation finance – around 90 percent short of the $310 billion to $365 billion projected needs for developing countries by 2035. To bridge this gap, rich countries would have to increase their adaptation financing tenfold.  

The total climate finance of $137 billion reached in 2024 is also just a fraction of what countries need to transition away from fossil fuels.  

This shortfall highlights a stark global inequality, that those who have done the least to cause the climate crisis are being hit by the heaviest damage and short-changed from the funding promised to help them deal with it. People living across the Global South, women, girls and Indigenous groups are overwhelmingly bearing the costs of environmental devastation. 

Meanwhile, super-rich corporations and individuals — largely based in the Global North — have seen their wealth skyrocket.  

The profits of the six biggest fossil fuel corporations are projected to hit $94 billion in 2026, continuing to attract mega-investors. Almost 60 percent of billionaire investments are classified as being in high climate impact sectors, such as mining or oil and gas corporations. 

“For too long, governments have coddled a super-rich elite whose huge emissions and dirty investments in polluting industries are throttling climate action. At Bonn, leaders must tackle this unequal concentration of wealth and power. It’s time to make rich polluters pay, and channel that wealth into accessible, participatory climate finance in a way that reaches the communities who need it most,” said Mariana Paoli, Oxfam International’s Climate Lead.  

Recent polling commissioned by Oxfam across seven countries found that approximately two-thirds (68 percent) of the public support increasing taxes on the profits of large oil and gas corporations to help fund a fair transition to renewable energy.  

Oxfam urges governments to:  

  • Slash the emissions of the super-rich and make the richest polluters pay, through taxation on extreme wealth, excess profits taxes on fossil fuel corporations, and a carbon capital levy on investments in polluting sectors. 
  • Remove the financial barriers blocking a Just Transition by cancelling debt, phasing out fossil fuel subsidies and overhauling a financial architecture systemically skewed against Global South countries.  
  • Substantially increase climate finance to support communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis. This means fulfilling the $300 billion annual target agreed at COP29, including tripling funding flows specifically for adaptation, and substantially increasing resources to address loss and damage.  

According to the OECD, in 2024, wealthy countries mobilized $137 billion in total climate finance to support climate action in low- and middle-income countries. Of this, $102 billion came in the form of public finance, mostly as loans. Public finance for adaptation amounted to $32 billion.  

The UNEP Adaptation Gap Report 2025 calculates that the cost of adaptation finance needed in low- and middle-income countries is $310 billion per year in 2035, when based on modelled costs. When based on extrapolated needs expressed in Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plans, this figure rises to $365 billion a year.

Oxfam research finds that six of the biggest fossil fuel companies (Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, Exxon and TotalEnergies) are projected to earn $2,967 a second in profits in 2026. Download the methodology note. 

Download Climate Plunder: How a powerful few are locking the world into disaster, the executive summary and the methodology note. The report is also available in Spanish, French and Portuguese. 

The global poll, conducted by market research company Norstat in April 2026, gathered responses from people in seven countries (UK, France, Brazil, Turkey, Australia, the Netherlands and Colombia). The polling also showed that support for taxing oil and gas corporations to fund the renewable energy transition crossed party lines. In six of the countries, there were more far-right respondents who supported such a tax, than those who opposed it.  

Nicaragua: Brooklyn Rivera’s death in state custody must be promptly, effectively and independently investigated

Source: Amnesty International –

In response to the announcement of the death of Brooklyn Rivera, Miskitu Indigenous leader and prisoner of conscience, Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International, said:

“Brooklyn Rivera should not have died in the custody of the Nicaraguan state. His death followed the deterioration of his health while he was being arbitrarily detained. During this time, the authorities held him without confirming his whereabouts, without access to his family or to trusted legal counsel, and without independent oversight to verify his situation. Amnesty International repeatedly warned that these circumstances placed his personal integrity and life at risk. Today, those warnings have materialized into a death that the state must explain.” 

Brooklyn Rivera should not have died in the custody of the Nicaraguan state. His death followed the deterioration of his health while he was being arbitrarily detained. During this time, the authorities held him without confirming his whereabouts, without access to his family or to trusted legal counsel, and without independent oversight to verify his situation.” 

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International

“This grave event cannot be met with silence or impunity. Under international human rights standards, all deaths in state custody must be investigated, as they may constitute unlawful deaths and, therefore, a violation of the right to life. We urgently call on governments in the region and international protection mechanisms to demand accountability from the Nicaraguan state and to call for a prompt, effective, thorough, independent, impartial and transparent investigation to clarify the circumstances of this potentially unlawful death. Now more than ever, they must also intensify their efforts on behalf of those who remain imprisoned for political reasons under conditions similar to those to which Rivera was subjected. Their lives are in grave danger.”

“The Nicaraguan authorities have an obligation to provide Brooklyn Rivera’s family with immediate and unrestricted access to all information related to his detention, the conditions in which he was deprived of his liberty, and the circumstances of his death. They must also ensure the dignified return of his remains so that he may be laid to rest in accordance with his wishes, respecting his identity as a Miskitu Indigenous leader and the traditions of his people. Any delay, concealment of information or reprisal against his family would further aggravate the state’s responsibility in this matter. Brooklyn Rivera’s family has the right to truth.”

The Nicaraguan authorities must ensure the dignified return of his remains so that he may be laid to rest in accordance with his wishes, respecting his identity as a Miskitu Indigenous leader and the traditions of his people. Brooklyn Rivera’s family has the right to truth.”

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact [email protected]

International: Spanish and Argentinian authorities must support justice for Venezuelan victims of crimes against humanity

Source: Amnesty International –

As a result of Venezuelan victims’ fight for justice under universal jurisdiction in Argentina, manifested by filing complaints before Argentine courts, and responding to recent reports of an extradition request from Argentine to Spanish authorities, Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International, stated today:

“Crimes against humanity, such as those committed in Venezuela, must stir the conscience of the entire international community and lead to tangible action towards protecting victims against past and future human rights violations and crimes under international law.”

Crimes against humanity, such as those committed in Venezuela, must stir the conscience of the entire international community and lead to tangible action towards protecting victims against past and future human rights violations and crimes under international law.”

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International.

Avenues for international justice have been opened and are sustained by courageous victims, including the investigation by the Office of the Prosecutor in the International Criminal Court – the first of its kind for a situation in the Americas-, and cases of universal jurisdiction.

Since 2023, we have closely monitored the case filed by the surviving relatives of victims of extrajudicial executions before Argentine courts and supported the jurisdiction of the local courts. News that this case and related criminal investigations are progressing, and an extradition request has been formally filed before Spanish authorities is a welcome step. We call on Spanish authorities to cooperate promptly and fully with this and any potential future requests, in view of contributing to justice and accountability for the crimes committed in Venezuela.

Victims, communities, and their representatives face continued risks in Venezuela. Their safety and rights, including, crucially, their right to truth, justice, reparations, and guarantees of non-repetition, must be a paramount priority for Venezuelan authorities moving forward. Amnesty International calls for the immediate dismantling of the state’s policy of repression, including the unconditional release of all those arbitrarily detained for political reasons, and for the overhaul of the justice system.

“Amnesty International’s research on universal jurisdiction underscores that states worldwide have both the authority and responsibility to act against crimes under international law, lending weight to current efforts for justice in Venezuela.”

Amnesty International’s research on universal jurisdiction underscores that states worldwide have both the authority and responsibility to act against crimes under international law, lending weight to current efforts for justice in Venezuela.”

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact [email protected]

Press Arrangements for IAEA Board of Governors Meeting, 5 June 2026

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

The IAEA Board of Governors will convene a meeting at the Agency’s headquarters starting at 10:00 CEST on Friday, 5 June, in Board Room C in the Vienna International Centre (VIC).

The meeting is convened by the Chair of the Board following a request from the Governors of the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Kingdom of Morocco, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to convene  an “urgent session of the Board of Governors … following the attack on the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant in the United Arab Emirates that has threatened nuclear safety in the UAE.”

The Board of Governors meeting is closed to the press.

IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi will open the meeting with an introductory statement, which will be released to journalists after delivery and posted on the IAEA website.  

The IAEA will provide video footage of the Director General’s opening statement here and will make photos available on Flickr.  

Photo Opportunity 

There will be a photo opportunity with the IAEA Director General and the Chair of the Board, Ambassador Ian David Grainge Biggs of Australia, before the start of the Board meeting, on 5 June at 10:00 CEST in Board Room C, Building C, 4th floor, in the VIC.  

Accreditation:

Journalists are requested to register with the Press Office by 16:00 CEST on Thursday, 4 June. Please email press@iaea.org.