Amnesty International and SALC intervene on landmark multinational mining case at South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal

Source: Amnesty International –

As the Supreme Court of Appeal starts hearing the appeal in Various Parties obo Minors and Another v Anglo American South Africa today, the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) and Amnesty International have submitted a joint amicus curiae submission urging the Court to consider international law relating to the right to an effective remedy and corporate accountability for transnational conduct in the certifications test of a class action.

This case is about more than one class action or one community in Zambia. It is about whether South African corporations can operate abroad without being held to the same human-rights standards we demand at home. South African courts have the power to close this accountability gap and to ensure that victims, wherever they are, can access remedies when abuses are linked to South African companies

Dr Atilla Kisla, International Justice Cluster Lead at SALC

The appeal concerns the certification of a class action by residents of Kabwe (Zambia) against the mining company Anglo American in South Africa. The claimants allege severe lead poisoning caused by mining operations in Kabwe. SALC and Amnesty International submit that the case represents a pivotal moment for corporate accountability and the rights of communities affected by transnational and transgenerational harm.

This case is about more than one class action or one community in Zambia. It is about whether South African corporations can operate abroad without being held to the same human-rights standards we demand at home. South African courts have the power to close this accountability gap and to ensure that victims, wherever they are, can access remedies when abuses are linked to South African companies,” said Dr Atilla Kisla, International Justice Cluster Lead at SALC.

In their submission, SALC and Amnesty International emphasise that South Africa’s Constitution requires courts to consider international law, such as the global consensus on the corporate responsibility to respect human rights and  the duty to provide effective remedies to victims  even when abuses occur beyond national borders by multinational corporations. SALC and Amnesty Internaitonal point to principles established under international law that have to be taken into account when Courts conduct an assessment of the interests of justice test relevant to the certification of the class action.

Mandi Mudarikwa, Head of Strategic Litigation, at Amnesty International highlighted that:

“This class action lawsuit stands as a quintessential David versus Goliath confrontation, marking a long-awaited step toward justice for the residents of Kabwe, who have suffered the devastating effects of lead poisoning for generations as a result of multinational mining operations. The certification of this class action could set a transformative precedent for corporate accountability, compelling powerful corporations to answer for their environmental and human rights abuses and inspiring similar movements for justice across jurisdictions.”

As the Court considers whether to certify the Kabwe community class action, SALC and Amnesty International underscore that the decision will resonate far beyond this case, setting an important precedent for how South African courts address corporate accountability and international law and transnational human-rights abuses within the framework of class actions.

This class action lawsuit stands as a quintessential David versus Goliath confrontation, marking a long-awaited step toward justice for the residents of Kabwe, who have suffered the devastating effects of lead poisoning for generations as a result of multinational mining operations. The certification of this class action could set a transformative precedent for corporate accountability, compelling powerful corporations to answer for their environmental and human rights abuses and inspiring similar movements for justice across jurisdictions

Mandi Mudarikwa, Head of Strategic Litigation, at Amnesty International

SALC and Amnesty International are represented by Lawyers for Human Rights.

Background

The Kabwe lead mine, once known as the “Broken Hill” mine, was allegedly operated and managed by Anglo American between 1925 and 1974 and reportedly contributed to extensive environmental pollution in towns and communities living in the vicinity of the mining site.

Today, experts describe Kabwe as one of the most lead-polluted places on earth. Medical studies have shown that children from Kabwe have record-high levels of lead in their blood. Children and pregnant women are at particular risk from lead toxicity, which is known to cause permanent damage to internal organs, including the brain.

The High Court in Johannesburg dismissed the application to certify the class action on 14 December 2023.

Tanzania: Unlawful killings and other human rights violations continue amid internet and electricity blackouts 

Source: Amnesty International –

In response to the ongoing partial internet shutdown by Tanzanian authorities following the October 29 general elections, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for East and Southern Africa, Vongai Chikwanda said: 

“For close to a week now, many people in Tanzania have suffered nationwide internet and electricity shutdowns.  Amnesty International is particularly alarmed by reports that amidst the blackouts, security forces have used excessive force to suppress and disperse ongoing post-election protests, resulting in the deaths and injuries of protesters.  

Amnesty International is particularly alarmed by reports that amidst the blackouts, security forces have used excessive force to suppress and disperse ongoing post-election protests, resulting in the deaths and injuries of protesters.  

Vongai Chikwanda, Deputy Regional Director, Amnesty International, ESARO

“This is the third time in less than a year that Tanzanian authorities have resorted to an internet blockade to silence dissenting voices. Authorities must immediately refrain from suppressing protests and instead respect, protect, and facilitate the right to peaceful assembly. They must immediately and unconditionally release all those arrested solely for exercising their right to peaceful assembly.” 

“Authorities should promptly, thoroughly, independently, impartially, transparently and effectively investigate all killings by security agents and bring to justice in fair trials those suspected of being responsible.  Authorities must also provide victims and their families with access to justice and effective remedies. 

Authorities should promptly, thoroughly, independently, impartially, transparently and effectively investigate all killings by security agents and bring to justice in fair trials those suspected of being responsible

Vongai Chikwanda

“The authorities must also allow both local and international media to freely report on the human rights situation in the country and refrain from restricting access to information, both online and offline including by immediately restoring internet access and access to basic public services. The ongoing restrictions are making it difficult to verify information, and to document election-related human rights violations.” 

Background 

Tanzanians went to the polls on 29 October in an election dominated by the ruling Chama cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party, with the two main opposition presidential candidates, Tundu Lissu from Chadema (Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo or the Party for Democracy and Progress), and Luhaga Mpina from ACT-Wazalendo, barred from standing. Verified videos showed protesters on the streets of Dar es Salaam, Mbeya, Tunduma, Tanga, and Mwanza among other towns.  Ahead of the elections, Amnesty International issued a briefing outlining how the Tanzanian authorities have intensified their repression of peaceful dissent against the opposition, journalists, human rights defenders, activists and civil society organizations.   

Authorities imposed nationwide internet restrictions on election day disrupting mobile data services and blocking access to social media platforms across major networks. On Monday 3 November, residents reported partial resumption in some cities. 

Nuclear is Global. Nuclear is Local.

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Globally, nuclear power is crucial for generating an abundant, clean and secure energy supply, with its usage expected to grow in the coming decades. The communities that host nuclear facilities play a key role in this story and are vital to the success of any nuclear power programme.

Greenpeace India Unveils Giant ‘Climate Bill’ in Coastal Odisha Demanding Big Polluters Pay

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

Coastal communities in Odisha’s Ganjam district join Greenpeace in a powerful call ahead of COP30, spotlighting trillions in climate damages caused by major oil and gas corporations.

Podampeta, Odisha, 2 November, 2025 — In a striking call for climate justice ahead of COP30, community members, women and Greenpeace activists came together in Podampeta village today to unveil a giant climate bill demanding that the world’s biggest fossil fuel corporations to be held accountable for the escalating costs of the climate crisis.

The centerpiece of the event was a large-scale installation of the giant printed bill depicting the message for global leaders — “Make Climate Polluters Pay”. The bill presents a selection of extreme weather events in South Asian countries since the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015, symbolizing the mounting losses communities are enduring due to climate change. 

The bill reveals that economic damages from carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions of five major oil and gas corporations since the Paris Climate Agreement (2016-2025) are projected to amount to over US$ 5.36 trillion, according to leading experts on the social cost of carbon (SCC). This is nearly 7000 times greater than the amount countries have currently pledged to the UN’s fund for loss and damage, set up to support communities in Global South countries facing the impacts of climate change.[2][3]

Set against the coastal backdrop of Ganjam, one of India’s most climate-vulnerable regions, this symbolic action sent a clear message to the UNFCCC and world leaders gathering for COP30: climate justice is not charity, it is accountability. Local communities’ participation underscored the human cost of fossil fuel-driven climate change and the urgent need for fair climate finance, adaptation support, and reparations for loss and damage.

“We have lost our homes, and our income to the cyclones that keep coming harder each year. The sea is rising, taking away our future and we are paying the price for a crisis we didn’t create. It’s time the big polluters pay for the damage they’ve caused,” said Chandragiri Tiki, community member from Podampeta village. 

Selomi Garnaik, Climate and Energy Campaigner at Greenpeace India, speaking at the installation, said, “Over the past decade, India has witnessed repeated extreme weather events like heatwaves, cyclones, floods and rising seas, that have grown in both intensity and frequency. Through attribution science, reports, experts and scientists have linked these devastation directly to the burning of fossil fuels. Communities like those in coastal Odisha are on the frontlines, losing homes, livelihoods, and health to a crisis they did not create. This giant bill represents the unpaid debt owed to communities who did not cause this crisis but are paying for it every day. As world leaders head to COP30, our message is simple that justice means making polluters pay and using those funds to protect people and the planet.”

Emissions from a handful of investor-owned oil companies are driving the climate crisis, making wildfires, floods, typhoons, heatwaves and droughts more frequent and severe. As the world looks to COP30 for decisive action, the voices from Podampeta echo a universal demand of “make climate polluters pay”. 

Check out the bill here: 

Media Contacts:

Nibedita Saha, Media Officer, Greenpeace India
[email protected] 

Selomi Garnaik, Climate and Energy Campaigner, Greenpeace India 
[email protected] 

Notes: 

Heatwave 2024- Data link: https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-international-stateless/2024/11/e4de275e-paying-the-price.pdf

[2] The quantification of economic damages since 2015 was provided to Greenpeace International by Prof. James Rising of the University of Delaware and Dr. Lisa Rennels of Stanford University. The analysis uses data from the Carbon Majors Database and the SCC methodology. The SCC was used by former US administrations and policy analysts to assign a dollar value to future damages from an additional ton of CO₂ between the year of its emissions through to the year 2300. 

Emissions data for the oil and gas companies was provided by the Carbon Majors Database, which in turn sources emissions data from publicly available company reports.

[3] Governments have so far pledged USD $768.40 million to the UN’s Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage Fund. USD $5,360,000,000,000 / USD $768.40 million = 6975.53 times, rounded up to 7000 times

[4] The giant bill is populated with a selection of some of the most expensive and notable extreme weather events since the Paris Agreement was adopted. These are sourced from the International Disaster Database EM-DAT. In this case they are noted for representative purposes only and not as part of the social cost of carbon calculation. 

[5] WMO confirms 2024 as warmest year on record at about 1.55°C above pre-industrial level[6] Calculations for reported profits between 2016 and first half of 2025, for ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, TotalEnergies. Data originally sourced from company reporting.

Update 325 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team today visited a substation critical to nuclear safety and security in Ukraine and reported damage as a result of recently reported military activities, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.  

Following reports of the damage caused, the IAEA promptly dispatched a team to one of the affected substations that had been targeted. The IAEA team conducted a thorough walkdown of the area, gaining immediate, first-hand insights into the damage and assessing its impact on the safety and security of Ukraine’s nuclear power plants (NPPs).  

The team confirmed the damage to the substation’s equipment and determined that there was a negative impact to the reliability of the off-site power supply to Ukrainian NPPs, thus affecting nuclear safety and security. 

“Attacks on Ukraine’s power grid represent an ever-present danger to nuclear safety and security to all nuclear facilities in Ukraine,” Director General Grossi added. 

While restoration activities on the power grid are on-going, one NPP remains without one of its off-site power lines and further repair work is needed. The IAEA will continue to monitor the situation.

IAEA Reviews Latvia’s Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team of experts has concluded a ten-day mission to review Latvia’s preparedness and response framework for nuclear and radiological emergencies. The Emergency Preparedness Review (EPREV) Service was carried out at the request of the Government of Latvia and hosted by the Radiation Safety Centre of State Environmental Service of Latvia (RSC SES).

The objective of the mission was to conduct a peer review of Latvia’s arrangements and capabilities for emergency preparedness and response against the IAEA safety standards and to provide advice for further enhancements.

Latvia does not operate any nuclear power plants. The country uses radiation sources in medical, scientific and industrial applications. The country’s research reactor has been permanently closed since 1998 and is currently in the early stage of decommissioning. Latvia operates a disposal and storage site for low and intermediate level radioactive waste, which is located 30 kilometres from the capital Riga. 

In addition to meeting with counterparts from RSC SES in Riga, the EPREV team interviewed a number of other Latvian government organizations, including: the Ministry of Climate and Energy; the Ministry of Agriculture; the State Emergency Medical Service; Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital; the State Fire and Rescue Service; the Food and Veterinary Service; the Latvian Environment, Geology and Metereology Centre; and the Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment.

Genaro Rodrigo Salinas Mariaca, Senior Specialist on Emergency Preparedness and Response at the Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation in the United Arab Emirates, led the six-person review team, which included experts from Bulgaria, Indonesia, Portugal, Finland and the IAEA. 

“Over the course of our work, we observed a strong commitment across institutions to enhancing nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness and response in Latvia,” Salinas Mariaca said. “The outcomes of this mission highlight both well-established practices and valuable opportunities for further strengthening integration, coordination and resilience.”

The EPREV team identified strengths in Latvia’s EPR framework, including:

  • The continuous proactive approach and strong determination of the RSC SES in leading preparedness and response initiatives for nuclear and radiological emergencies, despite ongoing staff-related constraints;
  • The government’s efforts to establish reliable communication channels to disseminate information and instructions to potentially affected populations, as well as to provide psychological counselling to first responders, emergency workers and the general public in case of emergencies; and
  • Ongoing initiatives to build public trust through effective crisis communication as a way to strengthen the overall national emergency response framework.

The team also made suggestions to further strengthen EPR arrangements, including: 

  • To align national regulations and emergency frameworks with relevant international safety standards;
  • To implement a national coordinating mechanism in all emergency response organizations;
  • To integrate the Crisis Management Centre into the national framework;
  • To conduct hazard assessments in line with relevant international safety standards to support a graded, justified and optimized approach to nuclear and radiological emergency arrangements;
  • To adopt reference levels, generic criteria and operational intervention levels in line with relevant international safety standards, defining guidance values for emergency workers and helpers, and including provisions to register and integrate non-designated emergency workers and helpers into emergency response arrangements; and
  • To establish arrangements for environmental and food monitoring during emergencies, setting clear criteria for the termination of emergencies and transition to recovery, and ensuring post-emergency analysis to support continuous improvement. 

The team emphasized the importance of ensuring that RSC SES and all key organizations have sufficient qualified personnel to effectively carry out their emergency responsibilities. 

“Latvia welcomes the completion of the IAEA EPREV mission, and I thank the international team for their professionalism, expertise and constructive engagement,” said Latvia’s Minister of Climate and Energy, Kaspars Melnis. “This review has enabled us to benchmark our systems against international best practices, identify areas of strength and pinpoint opportunities for improvement. We are committed to translating the mission’s recommendations into concrete measures to further enhance our preparedness and response capabilities, ensure public confidence, and remain aligned with international safety standards. Latvia values its partnership with the IAEA and looks forward to deepening cooperation in the years ahead.” 

About EPREV Missions

EPREV missions are one of the peer reviews offered by the IAEA to strengthen nuclear safety in Member States. EPREV missions focus on the arrangements and capabilities to prepare for and respond to nuclear and radiological emergencies. EPREV missions are based on the IAEA Safety Standards in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency.

IAEA Safety Standards

The IAEA Safety Standards provide a robust framework of fundamental principles, requirements and guidance to ensure nuclear safety. They reflect an international consensus and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.

The IAEA: Rising to Today’s Challenges and Maximising the Enormous Benefits of Nuclear Science and Technology

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

(As prepared for delivery)

Madam President, excellencies, distinguished delegates,

I would like to start by congratulating Her Excellency Ms. Annalena Baerbock on her assumption of the office of the President of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly. It is an honour to address the General Assembly, to present the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for 2024, and to update you on the Agency’s work. I would like to commend and thank His Excellency Mr Ian Biggs of Australia, chairperson of the IAEA’s Board of Governors, for his efforts in finalizing the draft resolution on the report of the Agency.

This General Assembly is happening at a crucial moment. Conflict, the erosion of global norms, and the gap between poor and rich are pulling at the fabric of our coexistence.

At times like these, International Organizations have a decision to make: Either continue along the path as if nothing has changed or recognise the challenges we face and choose paths that meet them.

At the IAEA we have our eyes wide open to today’s realities, and I will endeavour to describe the paths we are taking to support international peace and security.

We work at the intersection of nuclear non-proliferation, energy security and development. Our unique mandate ranges from reducing the risk of more countries having nuclear weapons to using nuclear science and technology to help support our 180 Member States in meeting their economic, environmental and social goals.

In essence, we help the world answer a fundamental question, that for more than 80 years has shaped its existence: How do we use the atom? Do we use it to overcome disease, hunger, pollution and energy insecurity, or do we use it as a weapon capable of ending life on earth as we know it?

The IAEA widens the access to nuclear science, technology and know-how. That includes, radiotherapy machines that diagnose cancer; nuclear power plants that provide low-carbon energy; and nuclear science applications that improve agriculture, track pollution, and provide the facts on which sound policy is made.

The IAEA supports nuclear safety and security so that nuclear science and technology benefit people and the environment and do not harm them, even at times of war.

As Director General I travel across the world fulfilling the IAEA’s mandate. At times of diplomatic disagreements, I have used my good offices to meet with leaders on opposing sides. The IAEA’s presence and its scientific know-how has brought clarity in difficult and unprecedented circumstances, from elucidating the situation at nuclear power plants at the front lines of the war in Ukraine to providing trusted analysis of water samples off the coast of Fukushima.

Responding to unprecedented challenges and opportunities has meant applying our mandate and all the assets of the IAEA in new ways amid tight budgets being made even tighter by inflation.

Madam President,

Let me start with our role as the world’s nuclear watchdog and then describe in more detail our work supporting social and economic development.

When the IAEA confirms the peaceful use of a State’s nuclear material, confidence over nuclear activities is established. History shows that when confidence disappears, international peace and security are at risk. This was the case in the DPRK, in Iraq, in Syria and most recently in Iran.

Last year, the Agency conducted more than 3 000 in-field verification activities in more than 1 300 facilities, with more than 240 000 significant quantities of nuclear material under its safeguards. As a result, we were able to draw safeguards conclusions for 175 States for which safeguards were applied. Where there have been unanswered questions, we have been firm, fair and steadfast in our efforts of engagement.

In June, after the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, we had to withdraw our inspectors. In September in Cairo, the Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran Dr Abbas Araghchi and I signed, under the auspices of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, an agreement that provides a clear understanding of the procedures for inspection, notifications, and implementation.

It is now time to implement the agreement. I am confident that a return of IAEA inspectors and the resumption of safeguards implementation in Iran would serve as a sign that agreements and understandings are possible. Nothing can replace dialogue in the pursuit of durable, lasting solutions to international challenges.

Both in international organizations and in diplomacy it is as important to grasp opportunities, as it is to rise to challenges. We must pursue every chance to bring States back into the fold of the international community. The IAEA has been doing this in Syria. I have met with President Ahmed Al-Sharaa as we look to make transparent and close a chapter of Syria’s past nuclear activities and enable the Syrian people to benefit from the peaceful applications of nuclear science and technology.

The global nuclear non-proliferation regime is under significant strain and we need to protect it. This is a message I shared with the Security Council a few months ago.

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s nuclear weapons programme continues in contravention of several UN Security Council resolutions.

But even within some countries in good standing with their obligations under the NPT, there are now open discussions about whether or not to acquire nuclear weapons.

We do not want a world with dozens of nuclear-armed States. In times like these, your support of the non-proliferation regime, the NPT and the IAEA, is even more crucial to international peace and security.

In April next year, here at UN headquarters, the IAEA will again report to the NPT Review Conference on its work making operational this crucial treaty.

Madam President,

The war in Ukraine – the first to threaten a major nuclear power programme – continues to threaten nuclear safety and security. Frequent power outages caused by the fighting, and military activities near the NPPs, heighten the risk of a nuclear accident at Europe’s biggest Nuclear Power Plant.

Despite considerable challenges, including, more than once, direct attacks on our teams, the IAEA maintains an uninterrupted presence at all the plants, rotating staff in and out of the area. They are providing indispensable support, actively assisting operators in looking after the Seven Pillars of nuclear safety and security and the Five Principles for protecting the Zaporizhzhya NPP, which we established at the UN Security Council in 2023, while keeping the international community informed through regular updates.

In spite of the difficulties, I have kept an open dialogue with both sides, meeting with President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation and President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, to keep this terrible war from causing even more misery through a nuclear accident with radiological consequences. Meanwhile, we continue to deliver nuclear safety and security-related equipment, as well as medical equipment to Ukraine.

In another area of importance for nuclear safety, I have said that the IAEA will be there before, during and after the discharge into the sea of the water that once cooled the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station’s reactors damaged in the 2011 accident and has been treated and stored.

Under the IAEA, independent monitoring, sampling, and analysis of the water has confirmed tritium levels that are well below regulatory and operational limits. In response to regional concerns, we introduced additional trust-building measures that expanded international involvement in the process.

Madam President,

For decades, scientists have been raising the alarm over the impact of harmful greenhouse gases on our planet and its people. But for many years, many people – including policy makers – looked away from a very important, proven low-carbon energy sources that is safe and scalable.

But the tide has now turned, and we have seen a return to realism when it comes to nuclear energy. Facts and the need for energy security have firmly overtaken misplaced ideology and the world has agreed that global climate goals cannot be met without it. Countries with nuclear programmes are expanding them, and about 30 “newcomer countries” are building or planning their first nuclear power plants.
In 2024, 417 operating nuclear power reactors in 31 countries produced about 10% of the world’s electricity and a quarter of its low-carbon electricity. More than 60 new reactors were under construction and more planned.

Projections were again raised, with the IAEA expecting nuclear energy capacity to increase as much as two and a half times by 2050. The momentum continues, but there is work to do.

Three keys are required to unlock global nuclear capacity at that scale: One, newcomer countries require support; two, regulation must adapt; and three, financing needs to be made possible. In all three areas the IAEA made strong progress. The IAEA’s Milestones Approach remains the gold standard when it comes to developing a new nuclear programme, with our Integrated Nuclear Infrastructure Review missions supporting newcomer countries.

Many countries and industries are interested in using Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Developing countries see them as more affordable and appropriate ways to power their economic development. Technology companies want them to run the energy hungry data centres fuelling the AI revolution. But first SMRs will need to be deployed, and that will require regulators to update their approaches without compromising safety. The IAEA’s Nuclear Harmonization and Standardization Initiative (NHSI) advanced its work in bringing together regulators to harmonize their approaches to regulation, and industry to standardize their approach to design. We have organized workshops and SMR schools in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and our SMR platform is a growing resource covering all aspects of the technology.

We continued to support non-power applications of nuclear energy, from hydrogen production to industrial heat, and seawater desalination to marine propulsion.

Developing countries must not be left behind, and the IAEA has been working with many in support of their wishes to introduce nuclear energy. We have also been working closely with the World Bank and other international financial organizations to make sure they have financing options. I am pleased to note that the World Bank this year lifted its ban on supporting new nuclear energy projects, marking a milestone and important step in getting nuclear power to countries that want and need it.

Madam President,

The range of lifesaving and life-affirming uses of nuclear science and technology is extraordinary. A very important part of the IAEA’s mandate is to widen their global reach. Our work in this area is deeply rooted in our mission of “Atoms for Peace and Development”. It is why many of our Member States join the IAEA and it is foundational to creating lasting peace and security.

Cancer is an acute crisis holding back many developing countries. It is a crisis for the those suffering from the disease and for the overwhelmed health systems unable to offer adequate treatment, including through the use of radiotherapy.

I have been determined that the IAEA, in close collaboration with its Member States and other international and financial organizations, be the catalyst for doing more. We have been doing this through the Rays of Hope initiative launched three years ago. Through Rays of Hope, concrete actions have been taken in 40 countries: hospitals have been built, radiotherapy machines procured, physicists trained, and lives saved. We have more than doubled the number of Rays of Hope Anchor Centres that serve as regional hubs of excellence and training across the world.

But more still needs to be done – we will continue, energized by the success of the past years.

Nuclear applications have also been key in fighting communicable diseases. I know that not one of us wants to witness another pandemic. But it is clear that COVID is not the last major zoonotic virus that we will have to contend with. The imperative is to catch their outbreak early. It is why, in the middle of COVID-19, we launched Zoonotic Disease Integrated Action, or ZODIAC. It has improved the preparedness of countries around the world. The ZODIAC network now is truly global, with 129 national laboratories already involved. More and more potentially devastating pathogens are being characterized, and the iVetNet platform now tracks data from more than 2 400 institutions. We are nipping the threat of the next pandemic in the bud.

Madam President,

In a world of abundance, 700 million people should not have to go to bed hungry.

Atoms4Food is a joint initiative between the IAEA and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) that provides tailor-made solutions to boost food security, support food safety and nutrition, and reduce agriculture’s strain on the environment. It is quite incredible what nuclear science and its applications can do.

Through Atoms4Food, we are supporting the use of irradiation to create hardier varieties of crops like bananas, cassava, rice and sorghum.
Through isotope hydrology, we are helping communities better manage their aquifers and water supplies.

Harmful insect populations are being shrunk through the Sterile Insect Technique, reducing pests like the fruit fly and New World Screwworm that decimate harvests and cause diseases in livestock.

In marine environments, we are fighting a different sort of pest. Microplastics are everywhere. They blight our common home and are present in the farthest reaches of our ocean. To create policies that tackle microplastic pollution, we must first better understand it. We need to know how it travels through our ecosystems and what impact it is having. The IAEA’s NUTEC Plastics initiative has two distinct approaches to dealing with plastic pollution. One supports 100 Member States wanting to use technology like infra-red spectroscopy to monitor and characterize microplastic marine pollution. The second supports more than 50 Member States looking to radiation-assisted technology to upcycle plastic waste into valuable products like construction material. Together, these approaches inform policies and create pathways towards a circular economy in which less plastic ends up in the ocean in the first place.

Madam President,

I do not deny that the world is going through serious political upheavals and that there are many problems in need of solutions.

But the future has not been dimed. We must grasp opportunities, point out what is right with this world, and empower nations and people to be part of shaping their future. Optimism takes courage and in times like these we must find ways to bring people with us in hope.
In the history of humankind, we have never before had the chance to know and do so much.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are giving each of us the chance to create the future we want.

Nuclear energy is back, and fusion energy is coming on in leaps and bounds. Private capital and public programmes are accelerating progress towards demonstration plants. The IAEA is playing its own part, through its World Fusion Energy Group, which is advancing work on regulatory frameworks, commercialization pathways and public engagement. We are bringing together the smartest people in AI with the smartest people in nuclear energy to discuss how nuclear power can fuel AI and how AI can improve the nuclear energy sector.

Madam President,

Every challenge is an opportunity. Peace is not passive – it is a dynamic, hopeful striving that requires all of us, women and men working together.

One the first things I did when I was elected Director General, was to announce the target of having equal numbers of men and women in the IAEA’s professional and higher jobs categories. It was a bold call at the time. Back then, women made up less than 30 percent of those roles, the IAEA was behind other members of the UN family, and the nuclear sector was far from embracing its full potential pool of talent. I am proud to be able to tell you that we reached parity ahead of our 2025 target.

Meanwhile, our dedicated programmes to widen the workforce of the global nuclear sector continue, including the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme and the Lise Meitner Programme.

The IAEA has the steadfast support of its Member States. This is a testament to their belief in our mandate and in the way we are fulfilling it.
We have shown that it is possible to make a big positive impact by using the resources entrusted to us wisely and efficiently.

We have been working harder and smarter amid a budget that has witnessed zero nominal growth over several years of strong price inflation.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen,

The IAEA is indispensable, and it will continue to be in the years to come. Thank you for the support you have given me and the Agency. Together, we will continue to rise to global challenges, stay positive, grasp opportunities, and serve humanity actively and with a commitment that befits our noble cause. The IAEA truly and really delivers, for all.

Thank you.

What happened to human rights for Palestinians?

Source: Amnesty International –

By Agnès Callamard and Federico Borello

When the world emerged from the horrors of World War II and vowed “never again,” nations laid the foundation for the system of international justice that now exists to address the planet’s worst crimes. Today, the United States is actively trying to dismantle it.

The Trump administration on Sept. 4 imposed sanctions on three leading Palestinian human rights organizations: Al Haq, founded in 1979 and a pioneer in documenting violations in occupied Gaza and the West Bank; Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, which for more than two decades has meticulously chronicled laws of war violations in Gaza; and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, which has long provided legal aid to victims, particularly from Gaza.

In June, the Trump administration imposed sanctions on another leading Palestinian rights group, Addameer, under a different set of measures.

This is part of a broader Trump administration effort aimed at those who support justice for Palestinians. The stated reason for the September sanctions was that the three groups had helped the International Criminal Court in its investigation of Israel “without Israel’s consent.” But the U.S. government has also gone after officials of the court, which has taken on an investigation that covers allegations of grave crimes by Israeli forces in Gaza; it has issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, accusing them of crimes against humanity and war crimes. The administration has placed sanctions on the I.C.C. prosecutor, deputy prosecutors and six of the court’s judges, as well as Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in Gaza and the West Bank.

Beyond what has been done to the Palestinians, the Trump administration has undermined the rule of law, protection of human rights and international justice, which all lie at the heart of a rules-based global order. The administration has slashed funding to the United Nations and threatened more cuts while disengaging from the U.N. Human Rights Council. It abruptly terminated nearly all U.S. foreign aid, which had supported human rights defenders and provided lifesaving humanitarian assistance around the world. Cuts to grants by the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor and offices on refugees, women and global justice further downgraded America’s commitment to human rights.

Al Haq, Al Mezan and the Palestinian Center are award-winning organizations that in extraordinarily difficult circumstances have exposed violations of human rights and environmental law by Israeli and Palestinian authorities, armed groups and businesses. They are the voice of Palestinian victims, amplifying stories of injustice that would otherwise remain unheard.

The groups have continued their courageous work in Gaza over nearly two years. Al Mezan and the Palestinian Center are based in Gaza, and Al Haq, based in Ramallah in the West Bank, has staff there as well. They have faced bombardment that has resulted in the killings or wounding of staff members and hundreds of their relatives as well as starvation and forced displacement. On Sept. 7, Israeli bombings flattened the high-rise building that housed the Palestinian Center’s headquarters. The offices of Al Mezan across Gaza were damaged and destroyed in 2024.

Governments need to condemn efforts to undermine the I.C.C.’s independence and to silence those who are documenting abuses.

The U.S. sanctions will not only disrupt the critical work that they are still able to do but also send a chilling signal to human rights defenders whose work implicates powerful actors or their allies. The Palestinian groups have been vocal in their support of the I.C.C.’s investigation into Israeli conduct and have made submissions to the court’s prosecutor.

Our organizations, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have worked closely with these groups for decades and, consistent with our longstanding and independent mandates to speak out in protecting human rights, we can attest that their work is indispensable to the human rights community not only in the region but internationally.

This work is part of a broad global movement advancing justice for victims and survivors of the human rights abuses. A credible system of international justice that addresses genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity is an essential element of building respect for human rights.The International Criminal Court is a central pillar of this system. Created through a treaty in 1998, the court is a forum of last resort. Governments intended to deliver on the post-World War II promise of “never again” by establishing such a permanent institution. The system is not perfect, but its capacity to seek to hold accountable even those in the highest positions of power can help end cycles of abuses. This power of the law is now at risk.

Further sanctions or other actions by the United States, including extending sanctions to the court as a whole, would jeopardize the rights of victims across the globe. Governments should rise to the occasion to protect the system they created.

When Israel designated leading Palestinian human rights groups including Addameer and Al Haq as “terrorist organizations” in 2021, nine European Union member states rejected the allegations as unsubstantiated. That pushback was likely a major reason Israel did not go further.

So far, other governments have carefully balanced their reactions to the U.S. sanctions for fear of provoking the Trump administration. This is a flawed strategy and out of step with the urgency the situation demands.

Governments need to condemn efforts to undermine the I.C.C.’s independence and to silence those who are documenting abuses. They should use regional and national laws, like the European Union Blocking Statute, which can be employed to nullify external laws in the union, to mitigate the impact of U.S. sanctions on those working with the court. Those who helped establish the international court and claim to uphold the values underpinning it must step up to defend them.


Agnès Callamard is the secretary general of Amnesty International. Federico Borello is the acting executive director of Human Rights Watch.

This article was originally published by the New York Times.

Ukrainian journalist Dmytro: “I never imagined that people would be kidnapped”

Source: Amnesty International –

Ukrainian journalist Dmytro Khilyuk was arbitrarily arrested, detained and forcibly disappeared by Russian armed forces for three years, five months, and twenty-one days— in hunger, cold, and without cause.

Taken from his home region near Kyiv in March 2022, he disappeared into Russia’s prison system. His case illustrates the plight of Ukrainians being forcibly disappeared, facing torture and other ill-treatment, and the dangers civilians — in particular journalists — face under Russian occupation.

Throughout his ordeal, Amnesty International worked with Ukrainian colleagues to trace his path through contacts inside Russia. Dmytro says he survived by “holding on to the thought that it would end one day.”

On November 2, the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists, Dmytro shares his story.

Before captivity, I’d often read in books that in prison the main thing is to remain human. Back then, those were just words to me; I didn’t understand what stood behind them. When I found myself imprisoned, I understood what humanity really meant.

In the hardest conditions, you must keep at least some humanity in yourself, not turn into an animal. Stay human. Even when you’re hungry, cold, and terrified.

We “celebrated” birthdays in captivity. The others would give the birthday person their pieces of bread, their breakfast, or their dinner — so that, for just one day, that someone wouldn’t be hungry.

Algeria: Authorities must quash outrageous 15-year sentence against unionist Ali Mammeri 

Source: Amnesty International –

In response to the sentencing of unionist and human rights defender Ali Mammeri, head of the independent National Union of Civil Servants in the Field of Culture and Art (SNFC), to 15 years in prison by the first instance criminal court of the Oum El Bouaghi tribunal, Nadege Lahmar, Algeria Researcher, said: 

“Ali Mammeri’s case is illustrative of the Algerian authorities’ use of unfounded and overbroad terrorism charges to crush peaceful dissent and undermine the activities of unions and other independent groups. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison solely for the peaceful exercise of his rights to freedom of association and expression, based on his union work, public advocacy for human rights, and private communications with exiled activists — which included sharing information that the authorities considered ‘classified’ regarding reprisals and restrictive measures against unions.

“Instead of investigating allegations that policemen repeatedly beat Ali Mammeri and stripped him naked to force a confession of involvement in criminal action, judicial authorities relied on his ‘forced confession’ to convict him.

“This travesty of justice and disregard for the rule of law must end. We call on the Algerian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release Ali Mammeri and quash his terribly unjust conviction and sentence. Authorities must conduct a prompt, thorough, independent, impartial, transparent and effective investigation into the allegations of torture and other ill-treatment of Ali Mammeri and bring to justice anyone suspected to be responsible.”