UK: MPs must press government to end all arms transfers to Israel after court ruling

Source: Amnesty International –

© Marie-Anne Ventoura/Amnesty International UK

Commenting on Al-Haq losing its Court of Appeal bid to challenge the High Court’s dismissal of its case over the UK government’s export of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel, Kristyan Benedict, Amnesty International UK’s Crisis Response Manager, said:

“The UK continues to send arms to Israel even as it commits genocide and enforces a system of apartheid on Palestinians. It’s outrageous that ‘international security’ is being used to justify the ongoing supply of arms to a country which is illegally occupying land and whose leaders are wanted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

“How can arming a genocide, apartheid, and occupation contribute to international peace or national security? It can’t.

“Parliament now has a duty to step in. It must demand full transparency from the Government regarding the potential impact of every single transfer to Israel and whether any item could be used to sustain the illegal occupation or facilitate violations of international law.

“MPs must demand that the UK complies with its domestic and international obligations, which requires an immediate end to all UK arms exports, training, and military cooperation with Israel, including the supply of F35 parts.

“The time for excuses is over – the UK must act now or continue to risk complicity in Israel’s ongoing mass atrocities.

“True peace starts with justice: Israel must be forced to lift the illegal blockade, end the apartheid, guarantee equal rights, and deliver accountability and reparations for all victims.”

View latest press releases

IAEA Donates Advanced Mammography Unit to Expand Breast Cancer Screening in the Amazon

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has donated a state-of-the-art digital mammography unit to the João de Barros Barreto University Hospital in Belém, Brazil, under the IAEA’s Rays of Hope initiative. The donation, which expands access to breast cancer screening and diagnosis in the Amazon region, was handed over on the sidelines of the 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), highlighting the Agency’s commitment to strengthen resilience of health systems amid growing challenges.

The new equipment will raise the hospital’s capacity to perform examinations for over 2000 women per year in Belém and across the Amazon region. Featuring advanced digital imaging technology, the mammography unit will enhance the accuracy and speed of breast cancer detection.

Belem, , widely known as the gateway to the Amazon, serves as a vital hub for healthcare in northern Brazil. Spread across a vast geographical area, cancer care in the Amazon is challenging due to the remoteness of many communities and the concentration of health services in a few urban centres. Strengthening health systems in this region is difficult due to weak infrastructure, training needs and logistical barriers, which make access to timely diagnosis and treatment difficult for many patients.

The João de Barros Barreto University Hospital is a publicly funded institution that provides free healthcare services, while also serving as a centre for medical education, research, and training of health sciences students. The donation ceremony brought together IAEA staff, hospital representatives, and officials from the Brazilian National Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN) to mark the handover of the new digital mammography unit.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in Brazil. According to the National Cancer Institute, an estimated 73,610 new cases are expected in 2025, with an incidence rate of 66.5 per 100,000 women. Despite progress in early detection and treatment, breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the country, especially in underserved areas such as the Amazon. Expanding screening and diagnostic capacity is key to reducing mortality and improving women’s health outcomes.

Today’s donation builds on continuing IAEA support to expand breast cancer screening across the Amazon Basin. In 2023, under Rays of Hope, the Agency helped install mobile mammography systems on vessels operating along the Amazon River, bringing essential diagnostic services to remote and hard-to-reach communities.

“Through Rays of Hope, the IAEA supports countries like Brazil in strengthening sustainable, resilient health systems that protect women’s health and reduce inequalities, even in the most remote areas of the Amazon,” said Raul Ramirez Garcia, Section Head of the Division for Latin America and the Caribbean at the IAEA, at the event.

“The arrival of this mammography unit marks an important step forward for women’s health in the Amazon region,” said Regina Feio Barroso, Superintendent of the João de Barros Barreto University Hospital. “Mammography is essential for the early diagnosis and success of breast cancer treatment, and this equipment will expand access to high-quality, equitable, and compassionate care in our hospital”.

The IAEA’s Rays of Hope initiative was launched in 2022 to expand access to life-saving cancer diagnosis and treatment in low- and middle-income countries. To date, over 90 countries have requested support and more than €90 million has been mobilized by donors and partners for the initiative. In Brazil, the IAEA continues to work closely with national and regional partners to strengthen capacities in radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiotherapy. 

IAEA Mission Recognizes Uganda’s Commitment to Improve Radiation Safety

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

During the IRRS mission to Uganda, personnel are scanned after an inspection at the Interim Radioactive Sources Management Facility in Mpoma. (Photo: Atomic Energy Council)

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team of experts has commended Uganda for its commitment to the continuous improvement of radiation safety, as reflected in its developing legal and regulatory frameworks. 

The IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) mission, which concluded on 12 November, was conducted at the request of the Government of Uganda and hosted by the Atomic Energy Council (AEC). The IRRS team also encouraged further enhancements, including the development of a national policy and strategy for safety to align more closely with IAEA safety standards.

Uganda does not have any nuclear power plants but uses radiation sources in medical and industrial applications. Uganda is one of more than 20 countries considering introducing nuclear power to diversify its energy mix. The East African country is also considering building a research reactor. 

The 10-day IRRS mission, which began on 3 November, covered all facilities, activities and exposure situations. IRRS missions are designed to strengthen the effectiveness of the national nuclear and radiation safety regulatory infrastructure, based on IAEA safety standards and international good practices, while recognizing the responsibility of each country to ensure nuclear and radiation safety.

The IRRS team – comprising 10 regulatory experts from 10 countries, as well as 2 IAEA staff members – conducted interviews and discussions with AEC staff. Members of the IRRS team also visited the AEC Interim Radioactive Sources Management Facility in Mpoma, as well as two facilities with radiation sources in Kampala – an industrial facility, Coca Cola Beverages Uganda Limited, and a medical facility, Sir Albert Cook Medical Centre.

“Uganda has continuously developed the regulatory framework for radiation protection and safety in line with the IAEA safety standards, while also increasing the number of competent staff at the AEC,” said Ritva Bly, the IRRS team leader and Principal Advisor at the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland. “The Government of Uganda together with AEC should continue to make efforts to improve further, as set out in the mission report, while also taking into account the intention to develop a nuclear power programme.” 

The team identified good performances, including:

  • Stakeholder mapping to ensure effective communication with stakeholders;
  • Awareness raising activities for staff to reinforce the AEC’s mandate, mission, vision and values;
  • Recording GPS coordinates of facilities in order to support future navigation, geomapping and inspection planning; and
  • Providing guides to support operators in developing radiation protection programmes. 

The team also provided recommendations and suggestions to help Uganda enhance its regulatory framework for radiation safety, including to:

  • Establish a national policy and strategy for safety, as well as for the management of radioactive waste;
  • Ensure clear allocation of responsibilities for safety within the governmental, legal and regulatory framework for safety and make provisions for the effective coordination of regulatory functions;
  • Further develop the application of the graded approach to all regulatory functions; and
  • Continue promulgating regulations on radiation protection and safety that are aligned with IAEA safety standards and proceed to further develop appropriate guides for implementation.

“The IRRS mission has provided Uganda with a valuable opportunity to benchmark our regulatory framework against global standards,” said Noah Deogratias Luwalira, AEC Secretary and Chief Executive Officer. “We are encouraged by the recognition of the progress we have made and are equally committed to addressing the areas identified for improvement to ensure that Uganda’s regulatory system remains strong, effective and in full alignment with IAEA safety standards.”

“As Uganda advances towards nuclear power, our foremost responsibility remains protection of people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation,” said Obwoya Kinyera Sam, AEC Chairperson. “We have embraced the IRRS recommendations as a roadmap for strengthening our capacity and effectiveness as a regulator in the nuclear industry.”

IAEA Safety Standards

The IAEA Safety Standards provide a robust framework of fundamental principles, requirements and guidance to ensure safety. They reflect an international consensus and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.

Six Ways Nuclear Science and Technology Help Protect the Environment

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

The IAEA is at COP30 this week explore how nuclear science and technology helps countries deliver clean energy, strengthen food security, manage water resources, and protect our oceans.
 

As global leaders, international organizations, scientists, business representatives and climate activists convene in Belém for COP30, the IAEA is showcasing how nuclear science and technology are driving solutions to environmental challenges. Nuclear science not only provides the world with reliable clean energy, but also helps scientists monitor and protect ecosystems, enhance food security and reduce pollution. 

At the IAEA Atoms4Climate Pavilion, visitors can see these innovations in action. In Brazil, for example, electron beam (e-beam) technology is transforming industrial wastewater treatment. In Latin America, countries are using nuclear techniques to control pestssafeguard crops and food exports — a win for farmers, consumers and the environment. 

The first tube shows untreated textile dye wastewater, the second irradiated water and the third irradiated water that has been treated with a higher dose. (Photo: IAEA)

1. E-Beam Processing for Industrial Wastewater Treatment

Treating wastewater contaminated by industrial pollutants remains a major challenge for many countries. Through its support for electron beam (e-beam) technology, the IAEA is helping countries develop innovative, chemical-free solutions that break down complex contaminants and improve water quality. Supported by the IAEA and Brazil’s Innovation Agency (FINEP), a mobile unit equipped with an electron beam accelerator is being deployed in Brazil to treat industrial wastewater, improving water quality and environmental protection.

Read more:
» Water Pollutants: The Invisible Crisis →
» IAEA Unveils Transportable E-beam System to Boost Global Access to the Innovative Technology

Mangroves in coastal areas capture and store organic carbon (Photo: Adobe Stock)

2. Protecting The Global Ocean through Blue Carbon Ecosystems

The IAEA’s Marine Environment Laboratories in Monaco support blue carbon initiatives that focus on mangroves, seagrasses, and saltmarshes — coastal ecosystems that capture and store organic carbon. Using nuclear and isotopic techniques, the IAEA helps countries assess carbon sequestration rates and ecosystem health, contributing to climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation. At COP30, IAEA’s work on blue carbon will be highlighted at the UN-Oceans session “Ocean-climate-biodiversity nexus: leveraging synergies across frameworks,” focusing on building partnerships for nature-based solutions.

Read more:
» What is Blue Carbon?
 

The Mediterranean fruit fly is a highly destructive pest threatening agricultural production worldwide. (Photo: R. Cardoso Pereira/FAO-IAEA)

3. Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) for Climate-Smart Farming

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is an environmentally friendly pest control method used to control harmful fruit fly populations in Brazil, Chile and Mexico. Sometimes described as birth control for insects, SIT works by releasing male insects that have been sterilized using radiation, which mate with wild female insects, resulting in no offspring. The SIT reduces reliance on insecticides, protects crops and enables countries to gain access to international markets for food exports. It is showcased at COP30 as part of climate-smart agriculture efforts using nuclear science and techniques. 

Read more:
» Sterile Insect Technique →

Nuclear data helps track glaciers’ retreat and the impact on water resources. ((Photo: IAEA)

4. Monitoring Glaciers and Water Resources in Mountainous Regions

Glaciers are retreating and even disappearing in many mountainous regions, threatening water supplies for millions. The IAEA supports countries like Bolivia in using nuclear techniques — such as Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensors and isotope hydrology — to monitor soil moisture and water availability in high-altitude ecosystems. These tools help scientists and decision makers assess the impact of glacier retreat on water resources and guide sustainable land management. At COP30, the IAEA is highlighting this work in the session “Nuclear Science for Climate Resilience”, aligned with the UN 2025 Year of Glaciers’ Preservation, and showcasing how nuclear applications empower local communities to adapt to changing conditions.

Read more:
» Glaciers on Borrowed Time: Capturing Data from Vanishing Ice in Bolivia
» From the Andes to the Himalayas

ITER is an international project that aims to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy production. (Photo: ITER)

5. Fusion Energy and Climate Action – the Conversation Continues

As the world seeks new solutions for clean energyfusion energy research is gaining momentum. At COP30, the IAEA is presenting the current state of fusion research and development, including progress on the international ITER project — the world’s largest fusion experiment based in France.  The session provides an overview of the current state of fusion energy including  developments across various international, national and private projects, and insights from the IAEA World Fusion Outlook 2025.

Read more:
» What is Nuclear Fusion? 
» Fusion Energy in 2025: Six Global Trends to Watch

The IAEA supports countries in identifying pathways to accelerate the deployment of nuclear power. (Photo Adobe Stock)

6. Financing Strategies for Low Carbon Energy Sources.

Building on the outcomes of the first Global Stocktake at COP28, the IAEA supports countries in identifying pathways to accelerate the deployment of nuclear power together with renewables as well as emissions abatement and removal technologies, particularly in hard to abate sectors and low-carbon hydrogen production. 

Accelerating deployment of small modular reactors (SMRs) is also in the spotlight at COP. SMRs offer flexible, cost-effective options for powering small energy grids, making them suitable for energy-intensive industries, data centres and commercial ships. An IAEA event will explore approaches to SMR financing, policy and regulation. 

Read more:

» Why Do We Need Nuclear Power
» What are Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)?
» IAEA Raises Nuclear Power Projections for Fifth Consecutive Year

Related News

Related resources

Global: Fossil fuel infrastructure is putting rights of 2 billion people and critical ecosystems at risk

Source: Amnesty International –

“We’re experiencing intergenerational battle fatigue… We physically won’t survive [this]. We were never the instigators but we have taken the brunt of all the violence,” said Wet’suwet’en land defender Tsakë ze’ Sleydo’ (Molly Wickham), while describing the imminent construction of new compressors set to increase the profitability of the Coastal GasLink (CGL) pipeline in Canada.

Extracting, processing and transporting fossil fuels undermines the human rights of neighbouring communities and causes severe environmental degradation, health risks, and loss of culture and livelihood.

Some of the groups interviewed described extraction as a form of economic or cultural pillage, perpetrated by corporate actors through intimidation and coercion. “We are not after money; we only want what is ours. We just want to fish in Guanabara Bay, it’s our right. And they are taking our rights,” said Bruno Alves de Vega, an urban artisanal fisher from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

All environmental human rights and Indigenous land defenders interviewed by Amnesty International faced severe safety and security risks, often stemming from disputes with companies whose activities threaten traditional ways of life and ecosystem integrity.

The fossil fuel era is inevitably coming to an end and states must stop criminalizing environmental human rights defenders fighting to protect their communities.

Candy Ofime, Researcher and Legal Advisor on climate justice at Amnesty International

Beyond physical and online threats, states and corporate actors have relied on lawfare, abusing legal action, including criminal proceedings, to silence, delegitimize and intimidate defenders. “When we rise up to defend the Yin’tah (Wet’suwet’en territory), we are criminalized. Civil injunctions are a colonial legal weapon that has become a mechanism for the militarization of our community, criminalization of our People, and for companies to carry out destructive extraction without Indigenous consent,” said other Wet’suwet’en land defenders.

Members of communities living in close proximity to fossil fuel infrastructure condemned the lack of direct and meaningful consultation and transparency from corporate actors. Many reported not fully understanding the scope of operators’ ongoing activities or expansion plans and stated that they had not consented to projects affecting their territory.

People interviewed by Amnesty International in the Saloum Delta in Senegal raised concerns regarding the poor dissemination of accessible information about the potential environmental and socio-economic impacts of the Sangomar project by authorities and project operator Woodside, a major Australian fossil fuel company.

“These case studies are but a few examples of a globalized problem. Most affected groups condemned the power imbalance between their communities and corporate operators, as well as the lack of effective remedy. The fossil fuel era is inevitably coming to an end and states must stop criminalizing environmental human rights defenders fighting to protect their communities,” said Candy Ofime, Researcher and Legal Advisor on climate justice at Amnesty International.

“States must investigate physical and online threats defenders face and put in place robust protection programmes to ensure critical voices advocating for an urgent and equitable energy transition can safely and meaningfully shape climate action.”

Northern Ireland: Call on Irish FA to back UEFA suspension of Israel after FA Ireland votes for action

Source: Amnesty International –

‘The Irish FA must now follow suit – they can’t sit this one out. Silence is not a neutral position’ – Patrick Corrigan

Amnesty International has called on the Irish Football Association (IFA) in Northern Ireland to support moves to suspend the Israel Football Association from UEFA and FIFA competitions, following the Football Association of Ireland (FAI)’s landmark vote at the weekend to formally seek the suspension.

At its Extraordinary General Meeting, the FAI voted by an overwhelming majority to submit a motion to UEFA calling for the immediate suspension of the Israel FA, citing breaches of UEFA and FIFA statutes including the organisation of clubs in illegal settlements in occupied Palestinian territory and failure to implement an effective anti-racism policy.

Amnesty International has written to the IFA, providing direct and substantiated evidence of breaches of FIFA’s own rules. In correspondence to Amnesty International last month, the IFA stated it “does not support the suspension of any member association unless there is a direct and substantiated breach of the governing bodies’ statutes.”

Amnesty’s latest letter sets out how the Israel FA permits football clubs operating in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank to play in the Israeli leagues – a violation of FIFA statutes, which prohibit clubs from playing on the territory of another member association without approval from that association. The Palestinian FA has never granted such authorisation.

The letter also references findings from the International Court of Justice and UN human rights bodies confirming the illegality of Israel’s settlement activity and the obligation on states and organisations not to support it, as well as UK government policy which states “settlements are illegal under international law”.

Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland Director, said:

“The FAI has taken a powerful and principled stand. The message is clear: football cannot ignore serious and substantiated breaches of international law and its own governing rules.

“The Irish FA must now follow suit – they can’t sit this one out. Silence is not a neutral position. The IFA can no longer claim to be waiting for evidence – that evidence has now been supplied.

“The Israel FA permits settlement clubs in the occupied West Bank to play in Israeli leagues. This breaks FIFA’s own statutes and entrenches illegal settlements. Football cannot preach fair play on the pitch while enabling human rights violations off it.

“The IFA must demonstrate leadership and show that football stands for fairness, equality and respect.”

In its letter to the IFA, Amnesty International notes that FIFA and UEFA have acted decisively before in the face of international law breaches, suspending South Africa during apartheid and suspending Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.

Osman Kavala: Hope for his country, quietly hopeless about his chances for freedom

Source: Amnesty International –

A conversation with Prisoner of Conscience Osman Kavala, by Amnesty International Türkiye’s Günal Kurşun 

A few weeks ago, as we approached the sombre milestone of Osman Kavala’s eighth year of unjust imprisonment, I visited him in the high security wing of Istanbul’s infamous jail, colloquially known as “the Silivri dungeon”. 

Sitting in the room reserved for lawyers’ visits, I sat face-to-face to Osman Kavala. We looked at each other through a thick pane of glass, rusted around its metal edges.  

I began by passing on greetings from many individual human rights defenders, together with collective greetings from colleagues at many civil society organizations. 

“Please convey my greetings to everyone,” replied Kavala, clear and resolute.  

And so began a conversation that would flow like water across the space between us. 

Kavala remains hopeful about Türkiye’s future; he believes that law and the public conscience will, sooner or later, find their way to the truth. For his own future, however, he is less optimistic: “It is hard to expect any change for me in the near future,” he says.  

In the stillness of that room, two sentiments hang side by side—hope for his country and a quiet hopelessness about the prospect of his own freedom. 

To be a bystander to this injustice and oppression makes us feel that not only Osman Kavala, but all of us, are prisoners

During my visit, the word “hope” circulated less as a private feeling than as a civic virtue. Kavala observed that diverse segments of society still show a will to live together; that young people’s ties with the wider world have not been severed; that the institutional ground of law, despite everything, has not been entirely razed; and Türkiye’s tradition of opposition has not been lost. Even through this prolonged darkness, a culture of solidarity has endured. 

His view of his own situation is less positive. 

“What I am facing is not a matter of one individual; it is a matter of the rule of law and the right to a fair trial. My personal freedom is, of course, important; but the core issue is the evidentiary standards on which judgments rest and the independence of the judiciary from political influence,” he tells me. “Keeping the legal debate within the language of law is the soundest contribution we can make to our shared future.”  

On the prison system more broadly, he points out that compulsory transfers have “become a kind of torture for both the prisoners and their families… Even in the period following the 1980 coup, when physical torture was widespread, our judges were more independent than they are today.”  

Osman Kavala was detained in 2017 and – despite a complete failure by prosecuting authorities to provide any evidence to substantiate the baseless charges laid against him – sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Despite two binding judgements by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ordering his immediate release, Türkiye’s highest court upheld the life sentence for Osman Kavala in September 2023. Two Constitutional Court applications he made following his conviction, and after it was upheld, are still pending a decision.  

In 2022, Amnesty International named Osman Kavala a prisoner of conscience and made clear that each day he spends behind bars is an affront to the concept of justice and human rights, principles that the Turkish state has committed itself to upholding. 

Three years on, Kavala remains deprived of his liberty. His case is widely regarded as a test of Türkiye’s obligations within the ECtHR system and an indictment of the system itself. The ongoing failure by Turkish authorites to give effect to clear and binding judgments speaks to the Turkish judiciary’s posture toward international legal obligations not just in Türkiye but for other Council of Europe member states too.  

On Saturday, dozens of prominent figures from the fields of journalism, academia, civil society and politics (including former President Abdullah Gül) shared messages of solidarity with Osman Kavala on the anniversary of his imprisonment. Writer Orhan Pamuk wrote: “To be a bystander to this injustice and oppression makes us feel that not only Kavala, but all of us, are prisoners.”  

We must keep pursuing the truth, insist on the language of law, and keep solidarity alive 

Türkiye now faces a painfully slow infringement procedure for its failure to comply with the ECtHR judgment. In the meantime, Osman Kavala is deprived of his liberty, alone in a cell in the dungeon.  

As we parted, Kavala expressed his belief that Türkiye will find its way through law, reason and dialogue; yet he is realistic about the timetable of his own freedom: “In prison, one learns time differently. I try to anchor hope not to calendar pages but to principles,” he tells me.  

Key among these principles is the right to a fair trial, reasonable suspicion, proportionate measures and judicial independence. But in Türkiye today, these principles are being tested for everyone. Only correct decisions in critical cases today will translate into legal security for us all tomorrow. 

Before Osman Kavala is led back to his cell, he asked me to send his greetings to all human rights defenders and to everyone dismissed by emergency decrees after the failed 2016 coup. His message is more than a greeting. It is a call to action. “We must keep pursuing the truth, insist on the language of law, and keep solidarity alive.”  

Günal Kurşun Lawyer, Amnesty International Türkiye Board Member

An extended version of this article was first published here by Bianet

Kazakhstan: Parliament’s last-minute “LGBTI propaganda” ban must not become law

Source: Amnesty International –

Reacting to the forthcoming reading in Kazakhstan’s parliament of draft amendments that would ban so-called “LGBTI propaganda”, Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director, said:

“Together with Kazakhstani civil society we call on lawmakers to reject these draft amendments before they become law. Banning so-called ‘LGBTI propaganda’ is not about protecting children, it’s about institutionalizing stigma, fear and censorship.

Banning so-called ‘LGBTI propaganda’ is not about protecting children, it’s about institutionalizing stigma, fear and censorship

Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director

“If the Kazakhstani authorities truly want to protect and nurture young people, they should rebuff this harmful initiative and instead reaffirm the country’s commitment to human rights and principles of non-discrimination already enshrined in the constitution and other binding legislation. There is no need to police love, literature or imagination.”

Background

On 13 November, the Majilis, Kazakhstan’s lower house of parliament, is expected to hold a full reading of draft amendments introducing a ban on “propaganda of non-traditional sexual orientation and pedophilia.” The bill, endorsed by a Majilis working group on 28 October, is now moving toward swift adoption. Lawmakers are reportedly seeking to finalize the amendments before parliament adjourns for the New Year recess in early January 2026.

The amendments propose mandatory labeling for public materials featuring LGBTI themes, including books, films and media content. Violations could lead to fines or short-term detention, and the authorities would be granted powers to suspend access to websites and digital content without court order. The provisions were added to an unrelated bill on national archives without public consultation or expert review.

The initiative follows a 2024 petition signed by 50,000 citizens demanding restrictions on public LGBTI representation. Last year, Kazakhstan banned LGBTI people from adopting or mentoring orphans. A similar set of proposals to outlaw “LGBTI propaganda” by amending the mass media law in April 2024 was withdrawn.

DRC: Landmark trial in Paris of Congolese armed group leader is a crucial step to ending impunity

Source: Amnesty International –

Ahead of the trial that begins on 12 November in Paris of Roger Lumbala Tshitenga, a Congolese armed group leader accused of complicity in crimes against humanity, including killings, torture and rape, that were committed in North Kivu province in 2002 and 2003, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for East and Southern Africa’s regional office, Vongai Chikwanda said:

“Survivors of these crimes have waited for over two decades for justice. This historic trial is an opportunity to send a clear signal that those suspected of criminal responsibility of mass atrocities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are mistaken if they believe they can hide in other countries away from scrutiny. All those committing crimes under international law and grave human rights violations in the DRC should be held individually accountable.

Survivors of these crimes have waited for over two decades for justice. This historic trial is an opportunity to send a clear signal that those suspected of criminal responsibility of mass atrocities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are mistaken if they believe they can hide in other countries away from scrutiny.

Vongai Chikwanda, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for East and Southern Africa’s regional office

“This trial is the first to use the principle of universal jurisdiction for crimes under international law committed in DRC by a Congolese national during the Second Congo War and a rare case against an official who once held the rank of minister. That the DRC has been unable or unwilling to investigate and hold domestic trials for past crimes is no longer an excuse for the international community to continue looking the other way. In fact, it is an opportunity for other countries where armed group leaders suspected of serious crimes live to assume their responsibility under the universal jurisdiction principle and open investigations into them.  

In fact, it is an opportunity for other countries where armed group leaders suspected of serious crimes live to assume their responsibility under the universal jurisdiction principle and open investigations into them.  

Vongai Chikwanda

“DRC should not escape its obligations to investigate and, if enough admissible evidence is found, to prosecute in fair trials those suspected of criminal responsibility for the serious crimes committed in the country for over 30 years, including those perpetrated during the six-day war in Kisangani in 2000.”  

Background

Roger Lumbala Tshitenga led the armed group Rassemblement Congolais pour la démocratie – National (RCD-N) active in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) during the Second Congo War (1998–2003). He also served as Minister of Commerce (2003-2005) and ran for president of DRC in 2006. He is accused of complicity in crimes against humanity, including murder, torture, rape, enslavement, and pillage, committed in 2002 and 2003 during Operation “Effacer le Tableau” (Erase the Board) in North Kivu and Ituri provinces. The operation became infamous for the crimes under international law committed against civilians, particularly the Mbuti and Nande ethnic groups, including killings, acts of torture, rapes and other sexual crimes, and forced cannibalism.

Israel must immediately halt legislation of discriminatory death penalty bill

Source: Amnesty International –

In response to the passing of the first reading of a controversial new amendment to the Israeli Penal Law making it mandatory for  Israeli courts to impose the death penalty against individuals convicted of killing an Israeli “either  intentionally or recklessly” if the act is motivated by “racism or hostility towards the public” and “committed with the  objective of  harming the state of Israel or the rebirth of the Jewish people”, Amnesty International’s Senior Director for Research, Advocacy, Policy and Campaigns, Erika Guevara Rosas, said:

“There is no sugarcoating this; a majority of 39 Israeli Knesset members approved in a first reading a bill that effectively mandates courts to impose the death penalty exclusively against Palestinians. While the text of the bill does not specifically single out Palestinians, the mental element required for the offence concerned signals its primary victims are going to be Palestinians and would include those who committed the punishable offences before the law is passed.

“Knesset members should be working to abolish the death penalty, not broadening its application. The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment, and an irreversible denial of the right to life. It should not be imposed in any circumstances, let alone weaponized as a blatantly discriminatory tool of state-sanctioned killing, domination and oppression. Its mandatory imposition and retroactive application would violate clear prohibitions set out under international human rights law and standards on the use of this punishment.

The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment, and an irreversible denial of the right to life. It should not be imposed in any circumstances, let alone weaponized as a blatantly discriminatory tool of state-sanctioned killing, domination and oppression.

Erika Guevara Rosas, Amnesty International

“The shift towards requiring courts to impose the death penalty against Palestinians is a dangerous and dramatic step backwards and a product of ongoing impunity for Israel’s system of apartheid and its genocide in Gaza. It did not occur in a vacuum. It comes in the context of a drastic increase in the number of unlawful killings of Palestinians, including acts that amount to extrajudicial executions, over the last decade, and a horrific rise of deaths in custody of Palestinians since October 2023. Not only have such acts been greeted with near-total impunity but with legitimacy and support and, at times, glorification. It also comes amidst a climate of incitement to violence against Palestinians as evidenced by the surge in state-backed settler attacks in the occupied West Bank.

“It is additionally concerning that the law authorizes military courts to impose death sentences on civilians, that cannot be commuted, particularly given the unfair nature of the trials held by these courts which have a conviction rate of over 99% for Palestinian defendants.

“On paper, Israeli law has traditionally restricted the use of the death penalty for exceptional crimes, like genocide and crimes against humanity, and the last court-ordered execution was carried out in 1962.

“If approved, this bill will not only set Israel against the global trend towards abolishing the use of the death penalty, but also the stated goal of abolition enshrined in a key international treaty ratified by the country in 1991.

“The bill’s stipulation that courts should impose the death penalty on individuals convicted of nationally-motivated murder with the intent of ‘harming the state of Israel or the rebirth of the Jewish people’ is yet another blatant manifestation of Israel’s institutionalized discrimination against Palestinians, a key pillar of Israel’s apartheid system, in law and in practice.

“The international community must exert maximum pressure on the Israeli government to immediately scrap this bill and dismantle all laws and practices that contribute to the system of apartheid against Palestinians. Israeli authorities must ensure Palestinian prisoners and detainees are treated in line with international law, including the prohibition against torture and other ill-treatment, and are provided with fair trial guarantees. They must also take concrete steps towards abolishing the death penalty for all crimes and all people.”

The first reading of the bill passed by 39 votes to 16. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception, regardless of the crime, the guilt, innocence, or other characteristics of the individual, or the method used. As of today, 113 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes, including seven since 2020.