Vice President Mike Pence on US-Saudi summit: ‘very real concern’ on F35 sales; criticizes Trump’s comment on Jamal Khashoggi killing

Source: Chatham House –

Vice President Mike Pence on US-Saudi summit: ‘very real concern’ on F35 sales; criticizes Trump’s comment on Jamal Khashoggi killing
News release
jon.wallace

The former vice president also expressed support for the US–UK ‘special relationship’ and for NATO and defended his 2017-21 administration’s record.

48th Vice President of the United States Mike Pence visited Chatham House on 19 November to discuss US foreign policy, isolationism and MAGA, the ‘special relationship’, and the recent visit of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to Washington DC.  

During the event, the former vice president expressed concern about the sale of F35 fighter aircraft announced following the US-Saudi summit this week.  

‘That’s the most advanced aircraft platform that we have,’ he said, saying the US must ‘carefully consider a transfer of that technology’ and take steps to ensure it does not become accessible to China. This was ‘a very real concern’, he added.

Asked by an audience member about President Donald Trump’s statement that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ‘knew nothing’ about the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Pence said:

‘What I can tell you is that I would not have made that statement… It’s very important that we never cast aside our deep commitment to the freedom of the press’.

During his speech the former vice president highlighted the threats posed by rising isolationism in the US, President Trump’s tariffs regime, and China. He also addressed Russia’s war on Ukraine, and expressed support for the USUK special relationship and NATO, saying that ‘our transatlantic alliance is not an artefact of the past’.

Pence stated that the US and UK are the ‘twin pillars’ of the free world, but also criticized UK government policies on migration, justice and intelligence sharing, which he stated are exploited by those in the US ‘who would say that the UK is not our friend, who would like nothing more than to see the Atlantic alliance crumble’.

Following his speech, Chatham House Director and CEO Bronwen Maddox asked whether the United States still respects the rule of law.

‘Emphatically yes,’ he answered.

Asked by Maddox whether Europe should assume that Ukraine won’t receive much more help from the United States, Pence pointed to President Trump’s apparent support for strong secondary sanctions on Russia.

‘This is a real moment of testing of the West,’ he said, ‘but I think you’ll continue to see American leadership’.

Asked if he believed that President Trump’s tariffs regime would outlast the administration, he replied:  

‘I hope not,’ pointing to the Supreme Court case examining the tariffs. ‘Our constitution…provides that taxes and tariffs…can only be enacted by the Congress,’ he said, pointing out that the American revolution was, in part, sparked by opposition to tariffs on tea.

‘At the American founding, taxes on tea were kind of an issue…’ he said to laughter in the room ‘those were tariffs’.

Watch the event in full.

Kenya: Authorities weaponized social media and digital tools to suppress Gen Z protests 

Source: Amnesty International –

*Names changed to protect identities 

Kenyan authorities systematically deployed technology-facilitated violence as part of a coordinated and sustained campaign to suppress Generation Z-led protests between June 2024 and July 2025 against corruption and the introduction of new tax legislation, a new Amnesty International report shows. 

The report, “This fear, everyone is feeling it”: Tech-facilitated violence against young activists in Kenya, shows how government and allied groups are increasingly weaponizing digital platforms to stifle protests as part of broader repressive measures designed to shut down digitally-organized dissent.  

“Our analysis of online activity throughout several waves of protests in 2024 and 2025 and the interviews we’ve conducted with young human rights defenders, clearly demonstrate widespread and coordinated tactics on digital platforms to silence and suppress protests by young activists, including through online threats, intimidating comments, abusive language, smearing, and targeted disinformation,    

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“Our research also proves that these campaigns are driven by state-sponsored trolls, individuals and a network of people paid to promote and amplify pro-government messages with the aim of reaching Kenya’s top daily trends on X.”  

Between June and July 2024, Generation Z – young people aged under 28 – led the #RejectFinanceBill protests opposing proposed taxes on essential goods and services. Between June 2024 and July 2025, young people also organized protests on and off-line demanding an end to femicide and corruption.  

Major demonstrations took place across 44 of Kenya’s 47 counties including Nairobi, Mombasa, and Kisumu. Social media played a major role in the organization of protests and amplification of protest voices.  

Kenyan authorities responded with online intimidation, threats, incitement to hatred, and surveillance interfering with rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. Online harassment and smear campaigns became core state tools to undermine the credibility and reach of government critics. Some of these tactics facilitated and were later used to justify arrests, enforced disappearances and killings of notable protest organizers.  

Amnesty International estimates that, across both sets of protests, excessive use of force by security agencies resulted in at least 128 deaths, 3,000 arrests and over 83 enforced disappearances. 

Introductory Statement to the Board of Governors

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Before I begin my remarks, let me welcome the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste in recently submitting its application for IAEA membership.   

Mr Chairperson,

Just a few weeks ago I was at the United Nations in New York, marking its 80th anniversary and delivering to the UN General Assembly our annual report. 

Among discussions about the UN system and its relevance today, it was absolutely clear that the IAEA stands out as crucial to peace and security and that it delivers on the world’s priorities, from non-proliferation to economic development.

IAEA inspectors are back in the Islamic Republic of Iran and have carried out inspections and design information verifications at many of the facilities unaffected by June’s military attacks. But more engagement is needed to restore full inspections, including at the affected sites, so that Iran fulfils its obligations under its NPT Agreement. I am in regular contact with Tehran and urge Iran to facilitate Agency access at its affected facilities and especially of its inventories of Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) and High Enriched Uranium (HEU), whose status needs urgently to be addressed. I will return to the subject in more detail later in my statement. 

This month was notable for the key positive success in our mediation to allow indispensable repairs to the Dniprovska and Ferosplavna power lines, ending a month of loss of off-site electricity to the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. The constructive engagement of both sides under the monitoring of the IAEA is another manifestation of the crucial role of the Agency in the very fragile and perilous situation at Zaporizhzhya NPP. This morning, I can confirm that a subsequent interruption of one of the lines has been resolved.  

Here in Vienna this week, the IAEA’s Technical Assistance and Cooperation Committee met, and the Board has before it the proposed TC programme for the 2026–2027 cycle. This programme has been developed in close cooperation between the Secretariat and Member States, building on Country Programme Frameworks, and on national and regional development priorities. To give you an idea of its scope and geographical reach: it consists of 452 new project proposals, 92 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 115 in Africa, 88 in Europe and Central Asia, and 151 in Asia and the Pacific. Six new interregional projects have also been proposed. Almost seventy percent of the proposed programme focuses on food and agriculture, health and nutrition, and safety, reflecting the priorities of Member States.

As of the end of October this year, we have received €70.6 million in contributions to the TCF, which represents a rate of attainment of 72.1%. Though this is below the rate recorded at this time last year; I trust Member States will maintain their strong support. Receiving the outstanding contributions is crucial to implementing the programme you approved for this year. I urge all Member States to pay their contributions to the TCF in full and on time. I also invite Member States that are in a position to do so to support the programme with extrabudgetary contributions. 

With the cleareyed view that budgets of our Member States are limited, I have been determined to increase the positive impact the IAEA makes across the world, most notably in those places that require our assistance most. We have done this through strengthened partnerships, including with non-traditional donors and development agencies.

It is also precisely why I launched the key initiatives: Zoonotic Disease Integrated Action (ZODIAC), NUTEC Plastics, Rays of Hope, Atoms4Food and Atoms4NetZero. They are an integral part of the TC Programme, raising awareness, building partnerships and mobilizing resources to enable us to strengthen and expand our work in the key areas of pandemic preparedness, plastic pollution, access to cancer treatment, food security and clean energy.

The Atoms4Food initiative continues to improve food security by making agricultural systems more effective and sustainable using nuclear techniques and technology. This month, new missions, to assess the situation and the needs, were completed in Peru and Benin, with Türkiye next in line. 

Through Zoonotic Disease Integrated Action (ZODIAC), we are using science and international collaboration to detect dangerous viruses and prevent the next pandemic. The initiative is helping to establish nine whole genome sequencing hubs in low- and middle-income countries. The Senegal hub, with support from ZODIAC and the VETLAB Network, sequenced the full genome of the Rift Valley Fever virus affecting Senegal, Mauritania and Gambia. This is crucial for outbreak control and just one example of how science is at the heart of what the IAEA does. 

Rays of Hope is another example of our growing work with non-traditional partners. The IAEA and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital are developing new training curricula to strengthen global capacity in paediatric cancer care, with experts from our Anchor Centres contributing to harmonized education for radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation therapists. 

Rays of Hope and ZODIAC are supporting experts in making the most of AI. We launched a global 12-part webinar series on AI for medical physicists, attracting over 3,000 participants worldwide, to promote the safe and effective integration of AI in clinical practice. Meanwhile, ZODIAC is supporting AI-driven diagnostic model development in the fight against respiratory diseases.

Next week in Manila, the International High-Level Forum on NUTEC Plastics, hosted by the Philippines, will mark five years of NUTEC Plastics achievements.

Much of our work relies on the use of our laboratories and I am pleased to say the refurbishment of our Seibersdorf facilities under the ReNuAL programme is now complete. The space now includes a visitor centre where more than 30 interactive exhibits covering our full mandate inspire visitors, including future generations of scientists, engineers and problem-solvers. I encourage you to come and visit us in Seibersdorf. We are reaching out to schools, universities, educational centres and other areas of society to come and see what nuclear science and technology can do for the benefit of all. 

Mr Chairperson,

The need for nuclear energy is no longer a topic of debate. The world agrees that we must invest in more nuclear capacity. Many countries are looking to nuclear for energy security and to meet their social, economic and environmental goals.  

Today, sixty-three reactors totalling nearly 20 gigawatts of installed capacity are under construction in 15 countries, three of which are newcomers to nuclear power. About 30 countries – including African countries – are looking to build their first reactors. 

The growing global momentum behind nuclear is reflected in the data. 

In 31 countries, 416 nuclear power reactors, making up more than 376 gigawatts of installed capacity, are providing almost 10 per cent of the world’s total electricity generation.

The upward momentum is reflected in the IAEA’s latest projections. Its high-case scenario shows global nuclear power generating capacity increasing more than two and a half times to 992 gigawatts by 2050. In the low-case projections, capacity rises 50 per cent to 561 gigawatts. Small modular reactors, or SMRs, account for about one quarter of the capacity added in the high case and for about 5 per cent in the low case scenario.

Achieving the high case scenario will bring with it greater economic growth, greater energy security and a greater mitigation of carbon emissions. The IAEA is supporting its Member States towards that end, including through its work with the G20, the G7 and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP). 

In October, I travelled to Durban, South Africa, for the first ever high level G20 meeting on nuclear energy, where I stressed the significant interest in Africa for nuclear power and the IAEA’s support to making it happen. A few weeks later, at the G7 meeting of ministers of energy and the environment, I discussed the return to realism about nuclear energy and the steps necessary to unlock its full potential. 

At COP30 in Belém, Brazil, the IAEA held more than a dozen events at its Pavilion “Atoms4Climate”, engaging Member States and partners across themes such as SMRs, climate-smart agriculture, water and soil protection, fusion energy, and blue carbon ecosystems. 

Following the World Bank Group’s decision to end the decades-long exclusion of nuclear energy from its financing instruments, we have been working closely together to operationalize this historic shift, including the identification of a first project. This momentum is now expanding across the international financial community. I have recently concluded new MoUs with the OPEC Fund for International Development and with the Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean (CAF), both aimed at strengthening collaboration on the financing of nuclear energy, including support for countries considering nuclear power. These partnerships mark an important step in building the financial architecture needed to help countries deploy nuclear energy, including in the form of SMRs, as part of their long-term energy strategies.

The AI–nuclear nexus is growing fast. Technology companies are turning to nuclear power, notably also to Small Modular Reactors, to power data centres, while AI is helping make nuclear systems safer, smarter and more efficient. On 3-4 December, the IAEA will host the first ever International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Energy at our headquarters here in Vienna. The Symposium will explore how nuclear energy can help meet growing electricity demand from the data centres driving AI and the ways AI can support the nuclear power industry. 

Through the Nuclear Harmonization and Standardization Initiative (NHSI), we are bringing together, in two separate tracks, industry and regulators from around the world. This is key, because SMRs will be a globally traded technology, requiring international collaboration on regulation and design. As we meet, NHSI participants are collecting examples and lessons on regulatory cooperation; and two further technical documents are expected to be published by the end of this year. In addition, a pilot multinational pre-licensing joint review of the EAGLES reactor has begun, with involvement of regulators of Belgium and Romania, and Italy as observer. 

Further – but not that much further – down the line, we see fusion energy moving towards commercialisation. To support its journey, the IAEA held the 30th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference and the 2nd Ministerial Meeting of the World Fusion Energy Group in Chengdu last month, bringing together participants from governments, research institutions, and industry. At the conference, we launched new international guidance to assist countries in establishing national fusion programmes and designated the Southwestern Institute of Physics as an IAEA Collaborating Centre on Research and Training in Fusion Energy.

The IAEA has been closely involved in the development of the ITER project since the beginning and I, in my role as IAEA Director General, remain the depository of the ITER Agreement. This month I saw for myself the steady and confident advances this important and unique international fusion energy project is making. ITER is a major player in supporting fusion development and early demonstration and commercialization. Our efforts through the World Fusion Energy Group align, and they reinforce the necessary coherence and convergence in global efforts to develop fusion energy. I toured the facility and met with ITER Director General Pietro Barabaschi and Anne-Isabelle Etienvre, chairman of CEA – both agreed to support the IAEA’s Lise Meitner programme. Therefore, in 2026, the next cohort of our programme for early to mid-career women will head to ITER and CEA sites in Cadarache for technical tours and lectures, networking, mentoring and leadership sessions.

Making sure the sector has the talent it needs is also important in the legal branch. The use of nuclear technology and material for the benefit of all rests on a specialized legal framework that needs to be kept up to task in a continuously changing environment. It is a complex and interdisciplinary section of the legal field. That is why three years ago we launched the IAEA’s University Partnership Programme on Nuclear Law. This pilot initiative has now come to fruition. Through the IAEA’s support, including training of professors and teaching staff, designing of syllabi, development of teaching methodology and provision of teaching materials, six academic institutions located in Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Jamaica, South Africa and the UAE now offer postgraduate courses in nuclear law, taught by each institution’s own faculty staff and as part of their standard academic programme leading to recognized higher education qualifications.

Mr Chairperson,

At the beginning of December, the IAEA will hold the International Conference on Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies, hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, focussing on how emergency preparedness and response can adapt to new technologies, emerging threats, and increasingly complex risk environments.

Today, the greatest risk to nuclear safety remains the war in Ukraine. Just because an accident has not yet happened, does not mean it can’t. In fact, the risk is growing as the military conflict is escalating. 

Since early May this year, the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant had been relying on just one off-site power line. In late September the plant was disconnected from that last remaining line. This resulted in the tenth and by far longest total loss of off-site power event since the start of the conflict, increasing greatly the risk of a nuclear accident.

Following successful negotiations with Ukraine and the Russian Federation, the activities to repair the two power lines – Dniprovska and Ferosplavna – commenced on 18 October on both sides of the frontline, and off-site power from Ukraine’s electrical grid to the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant was able to be restored. Agency staff observed the repair works in the field. A subsequent interruption of the Dniprovska has already been resolved. 

I once again call for the full compliance, at all times, with the IAEA’s Five Concrete Principles. It is of paramount importance that a nuclear accident at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant is prevented.

Meanwhile, even with all six reactors remaining in cold shutdown, a longer-term solution for cooling water at Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant needs to be found. 

Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant is not the only plant affected by the instability of the electricity grid. Military activity continues to plague the power grid throughout Ukraine. Khmelnytskyy and Rivne NPPs have been operating at reduced capacity for almost two weeks, due to damages, including very recent ones, to electrical substations critical for nuclear safety and security.

The Agency continues to monitor the status of Ukraine’s electrical infrastructure, focusing on electrical substations, critical nodes in a country’s electrical grid where voltage levels are transformed and controlled to ensure reliable power transmission.

Last month the Chornobyl site completed temporary repairs on some damages on the New Safe Confinement (NSC) as a result of February’s drone strike. Nevertheless, the NSC has not yet regained its ability to perform the confinement function and the IAEA will conduct, in the coming weeks, a comprehensive safety assessment of the NSC.  

Since the start of the armed conflict, the Agency has delivered over €20 million worth of specialized equipment and supplies—more than 170 shipments—to support Ukraine’s safe and secure operation of nuclear and related facilities, including electrical equipment, radiation monitoring, medical support, and isotope hydrology capacity-building. 

Meanwhile, the IAEA continues to verify the safety of ALPS-treated water discharge from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in Japan.

Under additional measures, experts from Belgium, China, France, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, the Russian Federation, and Switzerland are participating in these activities, adding transparency to the assessment. 

Tritium concentrations in the discharged water remains far below operational limits and align with the international safety standards. 

Task Force missions will continue to review all relevant Japanese technical and regulatory aspects. 

Mr Chairperson,

You have before you my quarterly report on the NPT Safeguards Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

On 9 September 2025, I signed an agreement with Foreign Minister Araghchi in Cairo that provides an understanding of the procedures for Agency inspections, notifications and safeguards implementation in Iran, in the aftermath of the military attacks in June. 

Since then, Iran has facilitated access to the Agency for inspections and design information verification, with advanced notice, at almost all the unaffected facilities in Tehran. This is welcome. 

The Agency has yet to receive from Iran a report for the affected facilities and associated nuclear material which, in line with its obligations under the safeguards agreement, needs to be provided without delay. To date, the Agency has not conducted verification activities at any of the nuclear facilities in Iran affected by the military attacks.

Though I note Iran’s cooperation on inspections at a number of facilities, further constructive engagement is needed.  I urge Iran to facilitate the full and effective implementation of safeguards activities in Iran in accordance with its NPT Safeguards Agreement and I reiterate my disposition to work with Iran on this matter. 

As I have already said, the establishment of the current status of Iran’s inventories of LEU and HEU needs to be addressed urgently. The Agency’s 5-month-long lack of access to this nuclear material in Iran means the material’s verification – according to standard safeguards practice – is long overdue.

It is critical the Agency be able to verify this material as soon as possible.

In the Syrian Arab Republic, I met His Excellency President Ahmed Al-Sharaa in June. He agreed to cooperate with full transparency to clarify, resolve and close the outstanding safeguards issues to do with Syria’s past nuclear activities.

As soon as conditions allow, we plan to visit Dair Alzour to conduct further analysis, access relevant documentation and to talk to those involved in past nuclear activities.

I am committed to achieving clarity regarding past nuclear activities in Syria in order to bring matters to a resolution.

The Secretariat has continued to engage Australia and Brazil on safeguards-relevant aspects of their respective naval nuclear propulsion programmes. I have provided two reports with updates on the consultations and will continue to keep the Board and Member States informed on relevant developments.

The Board has before it for approval a draft Additional Protocol to the Safeguards Agreement between the Agency and the Kingdom of the Netherlands concluded in connection with the NPT and Protocol I to the Treaty of Tlatelolco

The number of States with safeguards agreements in force remains 191, and 144 of these States have additional protocols in force. I look forward to the remaining three States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons without comprehensive safeguards agreements bringing such agreements into force without delay. I also encourage States that have not yet concluded additional protocols to do so as soon as possible. I am pleased to say that since the last Board meeting in September, Grenada has amended its original Small Quantities Protocol. I reiterate my calls for the remaining 12 States with SQPs based on the original standard text to amend or rescind them as soon as possible.

I will carry on my efforts to strengthen the indispensable legal framework on which the continued peaceful uses of nuclear science and technology rest.

The IAEA continues to monitor the nuclear programme of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

The Agency has observed that the 5MW(e) reactor at Yongbyon likely continues to operate in its seventh cycle. Between January and September 2025, indicators were observed at the Radiochemical Laboratory consistent with the reprocessing of a core load of irradiated fuel from the reactor’s sixth operating cycle. 

The ongoing operation of enrichment facilities at Kangson and Yongbyon is of serious concern. 

In addition, the Agency is continuing to monitor the construction of a new building at Yongbyon which has dimensions and features similar to the Kangson enrichment plant.

There are indications that the light water reactor (LWR) at Yongbyon continued in stable operation until early-August 2025 but has likely been shut down since then. 

There were no indications of significant changes at the Nuclear Test Site at Punggye-ri, which remains prepared to support a nuclear test. 

The continuation and further development of the DPRK’s nuclear programme are clear violations of relevant UN Security Council resolutions and are deeply regrettable. The Agency continues to maintain its enhanced readiness to play its essential role in verifying the DPRK’s nuclear programme.

Mr Chairperson,

Partnerships and Resource Mobilization remain a priority for me, as we cannot bring the benefits of nuclear science and technology to our recipients alone. In the past two years, we had a 31% increase in extrabudgetary contributions, and support from non-traditional donors more than doubled – reflecting growing recognition of the Agency’s work. In March, we launched a US $2.6 million water resources management project with the World Bank and Niger. In June I signed an agreement with the World Bank under which the IAEA and the Bank will work together in supporting the safe and secure use of nuclear energy in developing countries; it marks the Bank’s first concrete step in decades towards reengaging with nuclear energy. 

Dear colleagues,

In accordance with the Rules and Regulations, I informed Member States through the Quarterly Note of the Financial Situation of the Agency issued on 13 November and further updated on 18 November, that the Agency currently faces a serious liquidity situation due to delays in payments of 2025 assessed contributions.  

The total outstanding balance of overdue assessed contributions amounts to approximately €135 million. 

Mindful of the current challenges, and as per our practice, the Secretariat has been requesting that Member States pay their outstanding 2025 and advance 2026 assessed contributions to help the Agency alleviate the situation. This has allowed the Agency to have enough funds to cover November operations.

I thank those who have already advanced their payments and additionally appeal to those in a position to do so, to do the same.

It should be noted that if significant payments are not received soon, a situation could occur, in which, despite using the Working Capital Fund in full, the Agency might not be able to meet its legal obligations, including payroll. We cannot ignore this. 

I appeal to those Member States with outstanding contributions, to settle their overdue payments in a timely manner. 

The current challenges can be overcome, and I am confident that with your support we will continue to be able to do our indispensable work. 

The Courage to Do So

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

It has been over a year since I first came to the sinking islands of Tubigon, Bohol – Batasan, Bilangbilangan, Ubay, and Inanuran. A year since I stepped off a small wooden boat and into a world where the sea had become both home and enemy. A year since I met faces that smiled despite saltwater lapping at their doorsteps, and children who played in streets that the tides now claim each afternoon.

A photo during my first time visiting Batasan Island coinciding with SONA 2024.

I went there with the intention of doing community work – talking about the climate crisis, listening to stories, offering what little I knew. But what I found was a mirror held up to humanity: people who understood loss more profoundly than any report or statistic could capture. Their houses tilted toward the water, and yet their laughter carried an unbreakable lightness.

Over months of conversations, I watched a transformation unfold quietly. They began to name what was happening, to connect the tides that swallowed their homes and the storms that tore their roofs away to a crisis far larger than their islands. The words “climate crisis,” “justice,” and “accountability” became part of their daily vocabulary. And from that language, a new power grew.

Now, they are standing up not just to the waves, but to one of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies: SHELL. They are filing a case, demanding reparations for the destruction inflicted upon their islands by Super Typhoon Odette (Rai). They are asking not for charity but forResponsibility — for the company that helped fuel this crisis to move away from the business of harm and to pay for the damages they have caused.

Survivors of Super Typhoon Odette (Rai) sent a message using fishing boats, kayaks, and a giant banner: “SHELL, WE’RE SUING YOU FOR ODETTE.” They are taking Shell to court for the great harm they suffered from the storm that claimed 405 lives and injured over 1,400 others back in 2021. © Victor Kintanar / Greenpeace

Shell alone earned over USD 40 billion or PHP 2.4 trillion in profit in 2023, while continuing to expand oil and gas projects that scientists warn will push the planet beyond the 1.5°C threshold.

The world’s biggest fossil fuel companies — Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, Equinor, Chevron, and TotalEnergies — collectively made over USD 219 billion or PHP 12.8 trillion that same year.

Meanwhile, the Philippines loses billions annually to climate-related disasters. The contrast is almost unbearable: profit and loss measured in entirely different currencies:money on one side, survival on the other.

How extraordinary, that a handful of islanders whose homes are drowning have the courage to take on a multinational giant. How extraordinary – and how tragic – that they have to.

Because this should not be their burden to carry. It should be the task of our governments, our institutions, our so-called leaders: to defend the people they swore to protect. Instead, too often, they stand hand-in-hand with the very polluters that exploit us.

In the Philippines, new fossil fuel projects continue to receive permits, and coal plants still power our grids while communities on the frontlines are left to fend for themselves. Billions in public funds, most of which either disappear through corruption and poor governance or are spent rebuilding what should have been protected in the first place.

They speak of “development” while their people rebuild their homes for the fifth, sixth, seventh time. They attend climate summits and return with photo opportunities instead of policies. They talk about resilience as if resilience were a badge of honor, not a symptom of abandonment.

Climate scientists say the extreme weather brought by Odette was made more likely by climate change, driven by fossil fuel combustion. The case, which will be filed in London where Shell’s global headquarters is located, deals with the company’s historic carbon emissions, deception, and disinformation about climate change, which it has known about since 1965. © Ivan Joeseff Guiwanon / Greenpeace

But in these islands, I have seen a different kind of resilience. One that carries dignity instead of denial. I have seen people organizing community clean-ups, turning lessons into campaigns. I have seen elders recalling the coastline as it once was, tracing the memory of land now lost to the tide.

And so the question presses harder each time I return to these islands: Will our governments and institutions be courageous enough to fight for their people?

As COP30 draws to an end, let us remember that courage is not just confined to boardrooms or podium speeches. It also lives in the calloused hands that rebuild broken homes, in mothers who send their children to school even when the classrooms flood, in the communities who refuse to disappear – who still plant mangroves in the same soil that keeps sinking.

The people of Batasan, Bilangbilangan, Ubay, and Inanuran have already found their courage. They have looked power in the eye and said, you will be accountable for what you have done.

The real question now is whether the rest of us will find the courage to stand beside them, to challenge comfort, to confront collusion, to name the systems that make us suffer.

Because courage is contagious.
And perhaps, the courage to do so is the only thing that will keep our world from drowning


Charles Zander Deluna is a student and youth climate activist from Bohol. He is a volunteer for Greenpeace Philippines and has been involved in different climate campaigns and community work. His interest in climate action started after experiencing the impacts of Super Typhoon Odette (Rai), which inspired him to help protect the environment and support vulnerable communities.

Australia’s silence becoming deafening, as momentum builds for COP30 roadmap away from fossil fuels

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

BELÉM, BRAZIL, Tuesday 18 November 2025 — In response to the COP30 ministerial level press conference on a ‘Mutirão Call for a Fossil Fuel Roadmap’ Dr Simon Bradshaw, COP31 Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, speaking from Belém said: 

“This could be the turning point of COP30 in Belém as a large group of countries, including Pacific island states and fossil fuel exporters like Norway, today made an impassioned call for real action and a roadmap to phase out fossil fuels. 

“This follows the demands of over 40,000 people who took to the streets in Belém demanding less talk, more accountability, and concrete action to end the fossil fuel era.

“But the big question is where was Australia? As the aspiring COP31 host, Australia is yet to publicly join the growing call for a roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels. This is not what climate leadership and accountability looks like.

“It is way past time for Australia to get squarely behind Pacific Island nations and start championing the transition away from fossil fuels. Continuing down the fossil fuel path, and failing to align efforts with limiting warming to 1.5°C, is a breach of our international legal obligations and puts Australian and Pacific communities at risk of even more climate harm.

“We have the solutions and what matters is what we do now. The legal, moral, and political responsibility for climate action has never been stronger.”

-ENDS-

High res images for media use can be found here 

For more information or interviews contact Kate O’Callaghan on +61 406 231 892 or [email protected]

Mexico’s new NDC an ‘ambitious leap forward’ – Oxfam reaction

Source: Oxfam –

Following the announcement by the Mexican government of its new NDC, Jorge Martinez, Oxfam Mexico Climate Strategy Coordinator, said: 

“Mexico’s new NDC is the kind of ambitious leap forward the world urgently needs in order to prevent rapid climate breakdown. Mexico’s plan reaffirms a net zero path by 2050, introduces a dedicated Loss & Damage section, and has clear tools for implementation and equity – including the integration of recent opinions by the International Court of Justice and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 

“Mexico also breaks new ground by weaving care work into its climate plans more comprehensively than any NDC released so far. This integration of care considerations is crucial for women and girls around the world, who carry the burden of unpaid care work and are also most impacted by the climate crisis. 

“Mexico has set a high bar, not just for other countries but also for itself. Now, the Mexican government must follow through on their NDC with a rapid decarbonization process and provide the public financing needed to turn this ambitious plan into action.” 

Karelia Pallan in Belém | karelia.pallan@oxfam.org | +1 202 329 8283

Vinícius Braga in São Paulo | vinicius.braga@oxfam.org.br | +55 11 98459-0142

Cass Hebron in Brussels | cass.hebron@oxfam.org | +32 4859 13688

Saudi Arabia: Migrant workers behind the Riyadh Metro system subjected to decade of devastating abuse

Source: Amnesty International –

Migrant workers who travelled to Saudi Arabia to work on the Riyadh Metro project were forced to pay exorbitant recruitment fees, worked in dangerous heat and earned pitiful wages during a decade of serious abuse, Amnesty International revealed in a new report today.

The report, “Nobody wants to work in these situations”: A decade of exploitation on the Riyadh Metro project, documents labour abuses on one of Saudi Arabia’s flagship infrastructure projects. Promoted as the “backbone” of Riyadh’s public transport system, the newly-opened metro was built by leading international and Saudi firms under government direction and is slated for further expansion. However, many of the workers Amnesty International interviewed were charged illegal fees to secure work and then endured long, arduous hours in sometimes unsafe conditions for minimal, discriminatory pay.

“The Riyadh Metro is hailed as the backbone of the capital’s transport system, yet beneath its sleek exterior lies a decade of abuses enabled by a labour system that sacrifices migrant workers’ human rights. Already burdened with exorbitant recruitment fees, these workers endured punishing hours for meagre wages,” said Marta Schaaf, Programme Director for Climate, Economic Social Justice and Corporate Accountability at Amnesty International.

“Their hardships were compounded by exposure to extreme heat in a country where temperatures are soaring thanks to human-induced climate change. That such abuses persisted for years across multiple companies on a flagship infrastructure project exposes a glaring failure by the government to enforce protections and dismantle a system that leaves workers at high risk of exploitation.”

Exploited even before they left home

Amnesty International spoke to 38 men from Bangladesh, India and Nepal who were employed by a range of foreign and Saudi companies – including main contractors, subcontractors and labour suppliers – constructing the Riyadh Metro system between 2014 and 2025. For nearly all, the abuse started before they left home, when they were asked to pay between USD 700 and USD 3,500 in recruitment fees and associated costs to agents in their home countries, forcing many into serious debt and exacerbating their exposure to further abuse.

These payments often far exceeded the limits set by origin country governments and were demanded of the men despite Saudi law prohibiting worker-borne recruitment fees.

Suman, from Nepal, was forced to sell his wife’s family’s savings in gold to afford the exorbitant fees for a job paying a basic salary of just USD 266 each month:  

“I paid 100,000 rupees (USD 700) to the manpower agent. But during the preparatory work – travel, medical tests, and other paperwork – I spent a total of 200,000 rupees (USD 1,400). I didn’t have money with me at that time… I borrowed some gold from my wife’s parents, sold it, and got some cash… As the price of gold increased, I paid [back] almost double for that. It took me six months to pay off the loans.

A catalogue of abuses in Saudi Arabia

Once in Saudi Arabia, many workers were paid less than USD 2 per hour, while others earned barely half of that in their roles as labourers, cleaners and office assistants on the Riyadh Metro project. Virtually all worked 60+ hour weeks. While most of the workers said they were not directly forced to work overtime, their basic salaries were so low, they felt they had no other option. The government’s failure to set a universal living wage entrenches low pay among migrant workers – most of whom are racialized – denying many a decent standard of living.

“Due to the inflation in Nepal, this salary is too little to pay for household expenses. It vanishes as I pay for my children’s education and other household expenses. But what could I do? I have to manage,” Nabin told Amnesty International.

When I work in the extreme heat, I feel like I’m in hell…I think – How did I end up here? Did I commit anything wrong so that God is punishing me?

Indra, migrant worker, Nepal

The long hours workers spent on the Riyadh Metro project were often intensified by the unrelenting heat, with some describing the situation as like being “in hell”. With temperatures often remaining at least 40°C for more than eight hours each day during the summer months, the government’s ban on outdoor working in the direct sun from midday to 3pm proved a totally inadequate protection for workers. And temperatures are set to rise, as Saudi Arabia faces increasingly frequent and intensifying heat, a trend expected to worsen with global human-induced climate change.

“When I work in the extreme heat, I feel like I’m in hell…I think – How did I end up here? Did I commit anything wrong so that God is punishing me?” said Indra, from Nepal. “Nobody wants to work in these situations by their choice. But what can I do? I didn’t have a job in Nepal. I came here to support my family. So, I must be ready to suffer.”

Janak, from India, said he faced pressure by more senior staff at the subcontractor he worked for, to work in the extreme heat.

“The foremen and engineers would force us to work overtime even in hot temperatures. We would say, ‘We can’t. It’s extremely hot.’ But they would say, ‘keep working’… What can poor people do? We have to work. We have to do a difficult job.”

Many workers also reported facing other abuses, such as passport confiscation, overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions, poor-quality food, and discriminatory treatment based on job rank.

Systematic reforms and heightened human rights diligence urgently needed

The experiences of these men underscore not only the Saudi government’s failings but also the high-risk environment in which companies – including large multinationals – operate in when they decide to do business in Saudi Arabia’s construction sector, which depends heavily on a vast subcontracting network.

Indeed, despite limited reforms, the kafala system persists in practice. Combined with weak enforcement of labour protections – including inspections that focus more on compliance with Saudization targets and the legality of migrant workers’ employment status than on safeguarding their rights – and the recent reduction of penalties for abusive labour practices, this creates a permissive climate for exploitation. This context demands that companies proactively undertake heightened human rights due diligence to prevent any human rights harms. Such efforts are severely constrained in Saudi Arabia, where human rights are systematically repressed, and freedom of expression and association are effectively non-existent. If companies are unable or unwilling to assess and address any risks, they should consider not undertaking the activity.

For companies operating in or entering Saudi Arabia, these findings should serve as a clear warning: comprehensive human rights due diligence is not optional.

Marta Schaaf, Amnesty International’s Programme Director for Climate, Economic Social Justice and Corporate Accountability

“As Saudi Arabia pushes ahead with high-profile giga-projects, including the 2034 World Cup, the authorities must completely dismantle the kafala sponsorship system and rigorously enforce labour laws in line with global human rights standards. Strengthening safeguards and ensuring accountability for the millions of migrant workers who make these ventures possible is the only way to ensure they are no longer treated as disposable,” said Marta Schaaf.

“For companies operating in or entering Saudi Arabia, these findings should serve as a clear warning: comprehensive human rights due diligence is not optional. Without robust processes in place early on and an adequate plan to address any human rights concerns, businesses risk being directly linked or contributing to systematic labour abuses.

“Finally, countries of origin, including Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, must take responsibility for protecting their nationals by monitoring, investigating, and sanctioning the illegal conduct of recruitment agencies. Without proper accountability across all countries involved, the cycle of abuse will persist.”

Eswatini: Authorities must unconditionally release Mthandeni Dube and Bacede Mabuza

Source: Amnesty International –

Responding to the news of the conditional royal pardon granted on 5 November 2025 to former member of parliament, Mthandeni Dube, resulting in his supervised release, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Eastern and Southern Africa, Vongai Chikwanda, said:

“Mthandeni Dube’s release may bring relief to his family, but justice remains incomplete while his human rights are restricted by sweeping conditions and Bacede Mabuza who was arrested together with Dube, is still in prison. Both Mthandeni Dube and Bacede Mabuza should never have been imprisoned in the first place solely the peaceful exercise of their human rights. The Eswatini authorities must immediately and unconditionally release Bacede Mabuza and quash both MPs’ unfair convictions.

Mthandeni Dube’s release may bring relief to his family, but justice remains incomplete while his human rights are restricted by sweeping conditions

Vongai Chikwanda, Deputy Regional Director, Amnesty International, ESARO

“Mthandeni Dube’s release is subject to far-reaching limitations on his human rights, including prohibitions on political activity, public speaking and media engagement, as well as restrictions on travel and residence. These conditions, imposed under the supervision of His Majesty’s Correctional Services, unduly restrict human rights and effectively extend punishment beyond the prison walls.

The continued criminalization of Mthandeni Dube and Bacede Mabuza underscores Eswatini’s ongoing crackdown on peaceful dissent.

Vongai Chikwanda

“The continued criminalization of Mthandeni Dube and Bacede Mabuza underscores Eswatini’s ongoing crackdown on peaceful dissent. Eswatini authorities must take immediate and effective steps to protect civic space ensure and uphold the human rights of everyone including to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.”

Background

MPs Bacede Mabuza and Mthandeni Dube were arrested on 25 July 2021 after supporting calls for constitutional and democratic reform in Eswatini. On 31 July 2024, they were sentenced to 85 years and 58 years respectively under the Suppression of Terrorism Act (2008) and Sedition and Subversive Activities Act (1938). On 25 July 2025, Amnesty International designated both men as prisoners of conscience.

On 5 November 2025, His Majesty’s Correctional Services announced Dube’s conditional royal pardon, imposing strict limitations on his political engagement, public communication and movement. Bacede Mabuza remains in prison, serving an 85-year sentence imposed under repressive laws after proceedings that failed to meet international fair trial standards.

Saudi Arabia: Migrant workers subjected to ten years of abuse on Riyadh Metro project – new report

Source: Amnesty International –

Migrant workers who travelled to Saudi Arabia to work on the Riyadh Metro project were forced to pay exorbitant recruitment fees, worked in dangerous heat and earned pitiful wages during a decade of serious abuse, Amnesty International revealed in a new report today.

The 42-page report – “Nobody wants to work in these situations”: A decade of exploitation on the Riyadh Metro project – documents labour abuses on one of Saudi Arabia’s flagship infrastructure projects. Promoted as the “backbone” of Riyadh’s public transport system, the newly opened metro was built by leading international and Saudi firms under government direction and is slated for further expansion. However, many of the workers Amnesty interviewed were charged illegal fees to secure work and then endured long, arduous hours in sometimes unsafe conditions for minimal, discriminatory pay.

Exploited even before they left home

Amnesty spoke to 38 men from Bangladesh, India and Nepal who were employed by a range of foreign and Saudi companies – including main contractors, subcontractors and labour suppliers – constructing the Riyadh Metro system between 2014 and 2025. For nearly all, the abuse started before they left home, when they were asked to pay between USD 700 and USD 3,500 in recruitment fees and associated costs to agents in their home countries, forcing many into serious debt and exacerbating their exposure to further abuse.

These payments often far exceeded the limits set by origin country governments and were demanded of the men despite Saudi law prohibiting worker-borne recruitment fees.

Suman, from Nepal, was forced to sell his wife’s family’s savings in gold to afford the exorbitant fees for a job paying a basic salary of just USD 266 each month:  

“I paid 100,000 rupees (USD 700) to the manpower agent. But during the preparatory work – travel, medical tests, and other paperwork – I spent a total of 200,000 rupees (USD 1,400). I didn’t have money with me at that time… I borrowed some gold from my wife’s parents, sold it, and got some cash… As the price of gold increased, I paid [back] almost double for that. It took me six months to pay off the loans.

A catalogue of abuses in Saudi Arabia

Once in Saudi Arabia, many workers were paid less than USD 2 per hour, while others earned barely half of that in their roles as labourers, cleaners and office assistants on the Riyadh Metro project. Virtually all worked 60+ hour weeks. While most of the workers said they were not directly forced to work overtime, their basic salaries were so low, they felt they had no other option. The government’s failure to set a universal living wage entrenches low pay among migrant workers – most of whom are racialised – denying many a decent standard of living.

“Due to the inflation in Nepal, this salary is too little to pay for household expenses. It vanishes as I pay for my children’s education and other household expenses. But what could I do? I have to manage,” Nabin told Amnesty.

The long hours workers spent on the Riyadh Metro project were often intensified by the unrelenting heat, with some describing the situation as like being “in hell”. With temperatures often remaining at least 40°C for more than eight hours each day during the summer months, the government’s ban on outdoor working in the direct sun from midday to 3pm proved a totally inadequate protection for workers. And temperatures are set to rise, as Saudi Arabia faces increasingly frequent and intensifying heat, a trend expected to worsen with global human-induced climate change.

“When I work in the extreme heat, I feel like I’m in hell…I think – How did I end up here? Did I commit anything wrong so that God is punishing me?” said Indra, from Nepal. “Nobody wants to work in these situations by their choice. But what can I do? I didn’t have a job in Nepal. I came here to support my family. So, I must be ready to suffer.”

Janak, from India, said he faced pressure by more senior staff at the subcontractor he worked for, to work in the extreme heat.

“The foremen and engineers would force us to work overtime even in hot temperatures. We would say, ‘We can’t. It’s extremely hot.’ But they would say, ‘keep working’… What can poor people do? We have to work. We have to do a difficult job.

Many workers also reported facing other abuses, such as passport confiscation, overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions, poor-quality food, and discriminatory treatment based on job rank.

Systematic reforms and heightened human rights diligence urgently needed

The experiences of these men underscore not only the Saudi government’s failings but also the high-risk environment in which companies – including large multinationals – operate in when they decide to do business in Saudi Arabia’s construction sector, which depends heavily on a vast subcontracting network.

Indeed, despite limited reforms, the kafala system persists in practice. Combined with weak enforcement of labour protections – including inspections that focus more on compliance with Saudization targets and the legality of migrant workers’ employment status than on safeguarding their rights – and the recent reduction of penalties for abusive labour practices, this creates a permissive climate for exploitation. This context demands that companies proactively undertake heightened human rights due diligence to prevent any human rights harms. Such efforts are severely constrained in Saudi Arabia, where human rights are systematically repressed, and freedom of expression and association are effectively non-existent. If companies are unable or unwilling to assess and address any risks, they should consider not undertaking the activity.

Marta Schaaf, Amnesty International’s Director for Climate, Economic Social Justice and Corporate Accountability, said:

“The Riyadh Metro is hailed as the backbone of the capital’s transport system, yet beneath its sleek exterior lies a decade of abuses enabled by a labour system that sacrifices migrant workers’ human rights. Already burdened with exorbitant recruitment fees, these workers endured punishing hours for meagre wages.

“Their hardships were compounded by exposure to extreme heat in a country where temperatures are soaring thanks to human-induced climate change. That such abuses persisted for years across multiple companies on a flagship infrastructure project exposes a glaring failure by the government to enforce protections and dismantle a system that leaves workers at high risk of exploitation.

“As Saudi Arabia pushes ahead with high-profile giga-projects, including the 2034 World Cup, the authorities must completely dismantle the kafala sponsorship system and rigorously enforce labour laws in line with global human rights standards. Strengthening safeguards and ensuring accountability for the millions of migrant workers who make these ventures possible is the only way to ensure they are no longer treated as disposable.

“For companies operating in or entering Saudi Arabia, these findings should serve as a clear warning: comprehensive human rights due diligence is not optional. Without robust processes in place early on and an adequate plan to address any human rights concerns, businesses risk being directly linked or contributing to systematic labour abuses.

“Finally, countries of origin, including Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, must take responsibility for protecting their nationals by monitoring, investigating, and sanctioning the illegal conduct of recruitment agencies. Without proper accountability across all countries involved, the cycle of abuse will persist.”

Deeply disappointing: WA EPA will not assess risky carbon dumping in Browse Basin

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

PERTH, Tuesday 18 November 2025 — Two of Australia’s leading environmental organisations have said it’s “deeply disappointing” that the WA Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) will not assess Woodside’s high-risk, high-cost and unproven carbon dumping (Carbon Capture and Storage) plans at one of Western Australia’s most diverse and important reef systems. 

In September, the EPA accepted a joint referral by the Conservation Council of WA (CCWA) and Greenpeace Australia Pacific on Woodside’s controversial Browse Basin carbon dumping project, but has today said it will not proceed. 

Executive Director of the Conservation Council of WA (CCWA) Matt Roberts said Woodside’s own modelling showed that an oil spill within the proposed Browse Basin gas field would completely engulf Scott Reef, which is in Western Australian waters. 

“The impacts of spills could be catastrophic for WA’s oceans and coral reef systems, and the ongoing need for seismic surveys – involving blasting – creates unbelievable pressure on the species there,” Mr Roberts said.

“Offshore carbon dumping has been attempted around the world for decades and has failed. This dangerous and expensive experiment is the first of its kind in Australia and Western Australia and deserves the highest level of scrutiny. 

“Carbon dumping is a failed technology — we’ve seen this with Chevron’s Gorgon project where less than three per cent of total emissions have been sequestered successfully. There are no examples of carbon dumping that have met targets or been delivered on time or on budget.  

“Failed technologies should not be used to enable the development of new dirty polluting gas projects like Browse. We need much stronger commitments to abate carbon pollution, not false promises of storing these emissions – an out-of-sight, out-of-mind tactic.

“If anything goes wrong, it’s West Australians who will have to clean up Woodside’s mess.

“What is even more disappointing is that the WA government has removed the right to appeal ‘level of assessment’ decisions. There is now no mechanism in WA’s environmental laws to review or interrogate this decision, which we believe has serious implications for WA’s environment. 

“There is clearly a lot of public concern about this proposal, with more than 1,200 submissions made during the seven-day public comment period; more than 98% of which called for the WA EPA to assess the proposal.”

Greenpeace’s Rainbow Warrior ship sits near one of Woodside’s proposed drill sites at Scott Reef, Western Australia. The ship’s coordinates are near the closest proposed drill centre of Woodside’s Browse project to the reef.

Greenpeace Australia Pacific’s WA Lead, Geoff Bice, said the proposal would turn pristine Scott Reef, off the Kimberley coast, into an experimental testing ground for carbon dumping, and is urging the federal government to reject the plans.

“Woodside has tried for years to push through carbon dumping near Scott Reef, threatening endangered and important species like the pygmy blue whale and the dusky sea snake. Scott Reef cannot be used as a laboratory for Woodside’s dodgy carbon dumping experiments. 

“The environmental risks from this carbon dumping proposal are too big to ignore. After decades of research into this unproven technology and billions of dollars invested around the world, including here in Australia, there is little to show for it. Carbon dumping is expensive, experimental, and dangerous, and shouldn’t be allowed in WA waters.

“The next step is for the federal government to assess this carbon dumping proposal. We are calling on the Albanese government to look at this project for what it is – an unproven experimental project that means injecting carbon pollution into the ocean, threatening Scott Reef, Australia’s largest freestanding offshore coral reef, and risking WA’s coasts. The only responsible way forward is for the carbon dumping project to be rejected, and Woodside’s dangerous and polluting Browse gas project to be denied.

“If the WA government is genuine about wanting to reduce emissions, its focus should be on proven, cost-effective renewable energy technologies and phasing out dirty fossil fuels.” 

— ENDS —

Carbon dumping (CCS) has never been allowed to take place in Australian waters and the Browse Scott Reef proposal cannot be the first dumping proposal approved under state or federal environment laws.

The alliance of environmental groups including the Australian Marine Conservation Society, CCWA, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Australian Conservation Foundation and Environs Kimberley have made it clear that ongoing seismic blasting from the carbon dumping project, and risk of CO2 blowouts, would have immediate impacts on Scott Reef and the surrounding ocean ecosystem, and is an unacceptable threat to this fragile marine ecosystem.