Six Global Trends in Nuclear Power You Should Know

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Nuclear power delivers low-carbon, reliable electricity. As more countries aim for net-zero emissions, nuclear energy is increasingly seen as a crucial partner to renewable sources like wind and solar. 

The IAEA’s Power Reactor Information System (PRIS) tracks the status of nuclear power reactors globally.  All information and data items are provided voluntarily by countries and collected by the IAEA via data providers nominated officially by Member States. 

Here are six key trends from the Nuclear Power Status in 2025 that show how nuclear energy uptake is evolving:

1. Global Nuclear Capacity can Increase by more than double by 2050

According to the IAEA projections, global nuclear power capacity could double by 2050 — reaching between 561 GW(e) (low estimate) and 992 GW(e) (high estimate). This growth would make nuclear a key player in the clean energy transition.

2.  416 Nuclear Reactors are in operation around the world

PRIS is tracking reactor level data, and as status of reactors is updated on ongoing basis, it can vary from one day to another. As of 19 November 2025 there is 376.3 GW(e) of nuclear capacity provided by 416 reactors in operation across the world. In 2024, 421 operating reactors with total capacity of 377.0 GW(e) generated about 2617.3 TWh of electricity — enough to supply hundreds of millions of homes with low-carbon energy.

The United States remains the world’s largest nuclear power producer, with 94 reactors (96,952 (MW(e)) generating about 781.9 TWh of electricity in 2024.

China is rapidly expanding its nuclear fleet, operating 57 reactors (55.3 GW(e ) and building 29 (29.6 GW(e)) more. In 2024, it produced over 417.5 TWh of nuclear electricity. 

Nuclear energy also plays a big role in Europe’s electricity mix.  France leads the way with 57 nuclear reactors (63.0 GW(e)) generating about 67,3% of the country’s electricity in 2024— the highest share in the world. 

Other countries with high nuclear electricity production share include Slovakia with 60,6% of its electricity from nuclear, Hungary relies on it for 47,1% and Finland uses nuclear for 39,1% of its electricity needs.

3. 63 Reactors are Under Construction

Globally, there are 63 reactors under construction, which will add 66.2 (GW(e)) of capacity once completed. This shows that many countries are investing in nuclear energy to meet growing electricity needs, reduce emissions and climate goals.

4. New Nuclear Units Connected to the Grid

Several new nuclear units were connected to the grid during the period of 2024- 2025, including:

  • Barakah-4 (PWR, 1310 MW(e)) in the United Arab Emirates
  • Flamanville-3 (EPR, 1000 MW(e)) in France
  • Vogtle-4 (PWR, 1117 MW(e)) in the United States
  • Kakrapar-4 (PHWR, 630 MW(e)) and Rajasthan-7 (PHWR, 630 MW(e)) in India
  • Fangchenggang-4 (PWR, 1000 MW(e)) and Zhangzhou-1 (PWR, 1126 MW(e)) in China.

These additions reflect global momentum in deploying advanced nuclear technologies.

5. More Countries are Entering the Nuclear Scene

Nuclear power is growing worldwide.

South Africa is Africa’s only current nuclear power producers, with two reactors (1.9 GW(e)) providing about 3.9% of its national electricity. But, for the first time, Egypt is constructing four nuclear power reactors with total capacity of 4.4 GW(e) — marking a significant step toward diversifying their energy sources and developing local expertise.

South Asia is expanding nuclear capacity too, Bangladesh is building its first two reactors (2.2 GW(e)), while India is constructing six more (4.8 GW(e). Across Europe, Türkiye is constructing four reactors (4.5 GW(e)), Ukraine two (2.1 GW(e)), and Russia five (5.0 GW(e) — strengthening energy security and low-carbon power generation.

6. Non-Electric Uses of Nuclear Energy are Growing

In 2024, nuclear reactors provided 2,644 gigawatt hours of electrical equivalent of heat for:

  • District heating (94.1%)
  • Industrial heating (4.1%)
  • Desalination (1,9%)

China and Russia lead in these non-electric applications, showing how nuclear energy can support broader energy needs.

Nuclear At COP30: Facts, Youth, Momentum

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Sharing the facts, engaging with youth, building momentum: it’s the second week of COP30 and the IAEA’s Atoms4Climate campaign is going strong. Focusing on energy, food, water and oceans, the IAEA and its partners at COP are getting the word out about nuclear.

We’re not ‘vulnerable.’ We’re being sacrificed.

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

From the Philippines to Thailand, Kalmaegi shows how the world left Global South countries exposed again

Typhoon Kalmaegi ravaged different parts of the Philippines, with around 150 reported fatalities in Cebu alone.

© Ivan Joeseff Guiwanon / Greenpeace

Each time a storm tears through Southeast Asia, familiar scripts quickly follow. We are told we weren’t prepared enough. We are lectured about poverty and resilience, as though these conditions appeared naturally and not through decades of global inequality. The story the world tells about developing countries is one of perpetual helplessness, an easy narrative that masks a far harder truth.

The truth is much harder to swallow. We are in this position because wealthy nations and fossil fuel companies built an economy that forces developing countries, including here in Southeast Asia, to carry the heaviest burdens of a crisis we contributed least to. Germanwatch’s Climate Risk Index tells the same story. Three Southeast Asian countries, namely the Philippines, Myanmar, and Vietnam, rank among the world’s most affected by extreme weather.

Typhoon Kalmaegi (known in the Philippines as Typhoon Tino) is the latest proof. It swept across the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, leaving destruction that communities will be grappling with for months. Days later, Super Typhoon Fung-wong (Uwan) arrived with even stronger winds and heavier rains. New rapid attribution studies generated using the Imperial College Storm Model (IRIS) model reveal that climate change—driven overwhelmingly by the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas—intensified both storms and left more economic damages. Fung-wong’s wind speed increased by 5.5% in the Philippines and rainfall by 10.5%, while Kalmaegi’s wind speed rose by 3% and rainfall by 8.6% as it hit Vietnam.

In the Philippines, Kalmaegi claimed 269 lives and left more than $9 million in agricultural losses and over $8 million in damaged infrastructure. Vietnam recorded about $300 million in economic losses, with close to 60,000 homes damaged and over 39,000 hectares of crops destroyed. In Thailand, Kalmaegi compounded weeks of flooding in Ayutthaya, a province in the vulnerable Chao Phraya Basin, inundating over 63,000 households and damaging homes, cultural heritage, and infrastructure. The World Bank notes that Thailand is among the world’s most flood-exposed nations, with climate change projected to intensify river flooding and escalate future losses.

The flooding in Sena District, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province, continues to persist for more than four months, with water levels showing no sign of receding. The main cause is the steadily increasing water discharge from the Chao Phraya Dam, which has led to overflow from the Chao Phraya River and its tributary canals into low-lying areas. Homes and several roads are submerged under more than one meter of water, forcing residents to use boats for transportation and making daily life extremely difficult.

© Arnun Chonmahatrakool / Thai News Pix

Yet the region is often portrayed as chronically vulnerable instead of chronically wronged. While contributing only a tiny fraction of global emissions, they repeatedly face cyclone seasons that are now wetter and more unpredictable. Meanwhile, the nations and corporations that built their wealth on fossil fuels continue to profit while denying responsibility for the damages their emissions have created, all while investing heavily in Southeast Asia to expand fossil fuel projects that lock communities into decades more dependence on coal, oil, and gas.

As COP30 moves deeper into negotiations, progress remains slow and the ambition gap continues to widen. Fossil fuel lobbyists now outnumber several country delegations, and new UN assessments warn that the world is far off-track from keeping 1.5°C within reach. World leaders must agree to a clear, time-bound roadmap for a full, just, and equitable fossil fuel phase-out. They must accelerate renewable energy transitions, enabling communities to access clean, affordable power. They must ensure that the shift away from fossil fuels like oil, coal, and gas protects workers and supports communities who have lived for decades in the shadow of fossil-fueled development.

Above all, COP30 must deliver the finance that frontline communities need. Wealthy and historically high-emitting countries should provide new, public, and additional climate finance. The Loss and Damage Fund must finally function at scale. Recovery cannot be funded by loans that trap vulnerable nations in deeper debt. The Polluter Pays Principle must guide climate finance, and major fossil fuel companies must be held financially accountable for the harms they’re causing to the people and the planet.

Kalmaegi is a signal of a region being pushed beyond its limits. If COP30 fails to confront the root causes of these storms, Southeast Asia and other developing countries will continue to suffer the consequences of decisions made in boardrooms and capitals far from the damage.

The world owes developing countries more than sympathy. It owes justice and action that matches the scale of the crisis.


Jefferson Chua and Attapol Puangsakul are Greenpeace Southeast Asia’s campaigners in the Philippines and Thailand, respectively, working on key areas of climate litigation, policy, finance, and just transition.

Northern Ireland: Amnesty calls for public inquiry into clerical child abuse

Source: Amnesty International –

‘We must learn from past mistakes, or we will be doomed to repeat them’ – Patrick Corrigan 

Amnesty International has written to Northern Ireland’s First Minister and deputy First Minister supporting victims and survivors’ calls for a public inquiry into clerical child abuse, and for new safeguarding measures recommended in a report commissioned by the Northern Ireland Executive. 

Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland director of Amnesty International, who is also a member of the Reference Group on Historical Clerical Child Abuse established by the Executive, said: 

“After years of work, a report bringing together findings of three separate research projects into clerical child abuse has been with the First and deputy First Minister since July. 

“Victims and survivors, who courageously shared their stories of abuse with researchers appointed by the Executive, are now frustrated at the lack of political action. 

“The report contains clear recommendations – agreed by all the victims, researchers and officials involved – including safeguarding measures and a public inquiry into failings by church and state. We must learn from past mistakes, or we will be doomed to repeat them. 

“The recent revelations from the Presbyterian Church in Ireland show that clerical abuse and catastrophic safeguarding failures in faith settings are not historic issues but are very real current concerns that continue to put children at risk. 

“We are asking Michelle O’Neill and Emma Little-Pengelly to act on these recommendations without delay and to work directly with victims and survivors on how they will be implemented.” 

View latest press releases

Türkiye: New climate summit host must respect, protect and facilitate climate justice advocacy before, during and after COP31

Source: Amnesty International –

Responding to the news of Türkiye hosting COP31 next year, Marta Schaaf, Amnesty International’s Programme Director for Climate Justice said:

“As the newly designated host for the annual UN Climate summit next year, Türkiye must take decisive and transparent actions to tackle climate change in line with its international obligations as confirmed in this year’s Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice. This requires not only establishing and implementing greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets that are aligned with the collective target to keep global warming to below 1.5, but also delivering a full, fast, fair and funded fossil fuel phase out through a just and human rights compliant transition across all sectors that protects people’s rights and ensures that no one is left behind.

“Türkiye must also respect, protect and facilitate the work of environmental human rights defenders, and guarantee the rights to freedom of expression and to peaceful protest so that those advocating for climate justice can freely participate in shaping climate policies before, during and after COP31.”

Türkiye must respect, protect and facilitate the work of … those advocating for climate justice (to) freely participate in shaping climate policies before, during and after COP31.

Marta Schaaf, Amnesty International’s Programme Director for Climate Justice

Chad: Authorities failing to address deadly clashes between herders and farmers amid climate crisis

Source: Amnesty International –

The Chadian authorities have failed to protect the victims of armed clashes between herders and farmers as well as their right to truth, justice, and reparations, Amnesty International said in a new report.

“Live off the land and die for it: Human rights violations in conflicts between herders and farmers in Chad” documents seven episodes of herder-farmer violence – driven among other reasons by climate change pressures – in four provinces between 2022 and 2024 that left 98 people dead, more than 100 injured, and hundreds of families without homes or sources of income. In total, there are thousands of victims of these clashes, according to the United Nations data shared over the last years.

“Faced with recurring violence between herders and farmers, the authorities are failing to adequately protect the population. The security forces’ response is often delayed, and those suspected of killings, looting, and destruction of property are rarely brought to justice, fueling a sense of impunity and marginalization within communities,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International.

EU Simplification: Throwing human rights under the Omnibus 

Source: Amnesty International –

By Joshua Franco is a Senior Research Advisor at Amnesty Tech  

For years, the EU has taken a leading role in creating standards that protect our rights online. But the winds have now shifted, and under the guise of “simplification” a corporate-backed wave of weakening digital rules is underway that threatens all of our rights – on and offline. 

Digital and human rights advocates including Amnesty International have been documenting some of the human impacts caused by new technologies, and it’s clear from these, that what’s needed more than ever is stronger rights protections. Despite this, this simplification agenda aims to roll these very protections back. 

It is becoming increasingly clear that this process is inevitably leading towards the weakening of provisions of the AI Act and data protection, and perhaps much more. The Commission have also proposed a “Digital Fitness Check.” While we haven’t been told what this will mean in practice, it is most likely going to be an exercise to identify further laws to be “simplified”. All of this is being undertaken under expedited procedures without prior impact assessments to ask how individuals and communities experience or are harmed by high-risk and emerging technologies, on the preposterous basis that laws that protect our rights can be pared back without impacting our rights.  

Universities Launch Nuclear Law Courses with IAEA Support

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Since the inception of nuclear law, a widening gap has emerged between its growing importance  and the limited number of academic programmes available at universities and higher-education  institutions. Beyond specialised workshops and seminars for select audiences, there is a pressing need for academic programmes that can offer in-depth training at scale to meet the demands of a rapidly expanding energy sector. 

The UPP helps to fill that gap. Nuclear law now forms part of standard university academic programmes, with increasing cohorts of learners and researchers in the field. Since the launch of the Programme, the IAEA has supported partner universities in capacity-building and course development by training professors and teaching staff, designing syllabi, developing teaching methodology and providing teaching materials. The  initiative’s goal is to ensure that universities can deliver nuclear law courses independently and to the highest academic standards within their national educational systems.

The University of Buenos Aires was the first to launch its postgraduate course in nuclear law in May 2024 and is now running its second session. As of 30 October 2025, the other five partner institutions have also launched their courses.

“The creation of the Diploma in Nuclear Law at the University of Buenos Aires embodies a forward-looking commitment to cultivating a new generation of legal experts who, in line with the IAEA’s mission, will ensure that the peaceful uses of nuclear energy advance human development, international security, and the rule of law in a responsible and sustainable manner,” said Emiliano J. Buis, professor and course coordinator at the School of Law, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. 

Other academic leaders have also echoed their appreciation for the timeliness and need for the programme. 

For Alexandria University in Egypt, the new postgraduate course in nuclear law “is critical for enhancing awareness and understanding of the legal frameworks regarding peaceful uses of nuclear science and technology and is ideal for regulatory bodies, industry professionals and legal practitioners working in this field,” said Walid El-Barky, professor and Dean of the Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt.

In Brazil, the nuclear law course at the Institute of Nuclear Engineering is taught by Brazilian professors who are specialists in nuclear law and regulation. Many of them have been trained by the IAEA, both in law and in technical matters. “The Institute regards this initiative as a successful and pivotal starting point for consolidating legal expertise within Brazil’s nuclear sector and beyond,” said Rômulo de Castro Souza Lima, professor and course coordinator at the Institute of Nuclear Engineering of the National Nuclear Energy Commission, Brazil.

In the UAE, “the nuclear law course at Khalifa University draws students with technical and legal backgrounds from across the region, providing a foundation in law for nuclear technology deployment,” said François Foulon, professor and course coordinator at the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University, UAE.  

At the University of the West Indies, the graduate-level course in nuclear law prepares students to navigate the complex intersections of law, science, and sustainable development. “The launch of the course positions our university as a regional leader in advancing legal education in one of the most consequential fields of our times,” said Ramona Biholar, Deputy Dean (Graduate Studies and Research) and course coordinator, Faculty of Law, The University of the West Indies on Mona Campus, Jamaica.

Natalie Zimmelman, Chief Executive Officer, Wits Plus, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, said that the nuclear law short course, launched as part of the UPP, “is critical to ensuring the safe, secure and peaceful uses of nuclear technology and aligns with the university’s strong commitment to civic action and responsibility.” 

Whatever the venue, ‘Australia must perform’, says Greenpeace, as Türkiye confirmed as COP31 host

Source: Greenpeace Statement –

SYDNEY/BELÉM, BRAZIL, Wednesday 19 November 2025 — As Türkiye is confirmed as the COP31 host, Greenpeace Australia Pacific has urged the Australian government to show leadership and use its role to drive the phase out of fossil fuels. 

Türkiye and Australia had been competing to host the COP31 climate talks in 2026, with the decision coming down to the wire at the COP30 summit in Belém. Türkiye has been confirmed as host, with Australia salvaging the position of negotiations President — a highly unusual arrangement.

Speaking from Belém, David Ritter, CEO at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Whatever the forum, whoever the President, the urgency and focus cannot change, and phasing out fossil fuels and ending deforestation must be at the core of the COP31 agenda.

“Prime Minister Albanese and his government are not fighting hard enough for our future. Here in Belém, Australia was a notable absentee from the press conference calling for a road map to end fossil fuels. Australia should clearly and unequivocally commit to supporting Pacific demands for a phase out of fossil fuels and to do everything possible to limit warming to 1.5°C. 

“The Australia government’s moral and legal obligations to its own citizens, to the Pacific, and to global efforts to slash climate pollution remain unchanged. There is still a global spotlight on Anthony Albanese because Australia is the third-largest fossil fuel exporter in the world, one of the highest-emitting countries and a global deforestation hotspot. All of this is hopelessly inconsistent with the future safety and security of both the Australian people and Pacific communities. 

“Australia has the global responsibility as COP31 President to show the kind of leadership for the world that is being demanded by  Pacific nations . As over 80 countries have already made clear at COP30 in Bélem, there needs to be a rapid global phase out of fossil fuels and a clear roadmap to do so. 

“The Albanese government must end approvals for new coal and gas projects, and deliver a clear national plan and timeline for the managed phase-out of all fossil fuels, including exports. 

“The world’s political leaders have a sacred duty to limit warming to the 1.5°C temperature goal, agreed under the Paris Agreement 10 years ago. Any delay will be measured in the accelerating loss of human life and the destruction of the natural world. The obligation to act is clear. What matters is the action we take now.”

Also in Belém, Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “While it is disappointing that Australia’s bid for hosting the Pacific COP31 was unsuccessful, the Pacific’s fight for survival does not rise or fall on a single hosting decision. For us, climate action has never been about prestige — it is about protecting and preserving our homelands, our cultures, and our future with dignity and humility. 

“Hosting COP in our region would have built on the foundations of strong, ambitious Pacific leadership — but our commitment does not waver because of a lost bid.

“Science is crystal clear: to keep 1.5°C alive, the world must rapidly and equitably phase out fossil fuels. No exceptions. No delays. And those who have profited from polluting must finally pay their fair share for the loss and damage our communities are living with every day.

“The Pacific has carried the moral compass of the climate movement for decades, and we will continue to push global powers to rise to the moment. Our islands may be small, but our resolve is immense. 

“We will keep fighting — in every space we can, no matter where the COP is — for a safe, just and livable future for all. This fight does not start and end at COPs, it starts in our communities and ends in the hearts of justice.”

-ENDS-

High res images for media use can be found here 

For more information or interviews contact Kate O’Callaghan on +61 406 231 892 or [email protected] 

EU: Digital omnibus proposals will tear apart accountability on digital rights 

Source: Amnesty International –

Responding to the European Commission’s so-called “digital omnibus” proposals, which will dismantle the bloc’s protections against digital threats, Damini Satija, Programme Director at Amnesty Tech, said: 

“The EU’s ongoing deregulatory push will lead to a weakening of people’s rights and expose them to digital oppression. It will open the door to unlawful surveillance, discriminatory profiling in welfare and policing, strip people of their right to have control of their personal data and object to automated decisions, and the spread of harmful content online. It will also make it harder to detect and challenge decisions made by automated systems on who gets social benefits, jobs, and educational opportunities, while further exacerbating climate harms fuelled by policies that prioritize the tech industry. 

“Years of hard work by civil society, trade unions, and human rights defenders has gone into ensuring that the EU’s digital rulebook protects people against digital threats and unfair AI systems, while safeguarding their data and holding governments and corporations accountable for misusing technologies. These measures are essential for a digitally safe society.  

“Some of these hard-won laws have yet to even come into effect, but the EU is already seeking to shift the balance of power from individual protections to corporate impunity, conceding to the profit-centric motives of tech behemoths who often operate at the cost of our rights.  

Years of hard work by civil society, trade unions, and human rights defenders has gone into ensuring that the EU’s digital rulebook protects people against digital threats and unfair AI systems, while safeguarding their data and holding governments and corporations accountable for misusing technologies. These measures are essential for a digitally safe society.  

Damini Satija, Programme Director, Amnesty Tech

“If the EU truly wants to support the smooth implementation of digital laws, including the AI Act, the GDPR, and other vital protections, it should strengthen existing safeguards and ensure that laws are meaningfully enforced – not dismantle the frameworks that currently hold companies to account and allow progress towards a rights-respecting tech future.” 

Background 

The digital omnibus is part of a wider deregulatory push by the EU, which civil society has raised alarm over.