Update 333 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) temporarily lost all off-site power for the 12th time since the start of the military conflict, following widespread military activity that disrupted the country’s electrical grid on 13 December. This incident once again underscores the continued fragility of nuclear safety conditions amid the conflict, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.

In the early hours of 13 December, both the 750 kV Dniprovska main power line and the 330 kV Ferosplavna-1 backup power line were disconnected, resulting in a complete loss of off-site power for more than two hours. All available emergency diesel generators automatically started, ensuring continued cooling and other essential safety functions. Both external power lines supplying the plant – Europe’s largest Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) – have since been reconnected and the diesel generators were returned to standby mode.

On 15 December, despite the ZNPP maintaining access to its two remaining external power lines, another incident highlighted the plant’s fragile nuclear safety situation. Power transmission between the ZNPP switchyard and the Zaporizhzhya Thermal Power Plant (ZTPP) switchyard through the autotransformer became unavailable, significantly reducing flexibility and resilience of the site’s electrical configuration. Following an investigation conducted by the ZNPP, damage to the transmission line was detected between the autotransformer and the ZTPP switchyard, reportedly due to military activity.

The ZNPP reported to the IAEA team at the plant that access to the affected area cannot be granted for security reasons. As of today, the ZNPP is still investigating ways to repair the line. 

Separately, nuclear safety at Ukraine’s three operating NPPs remains under pressure due to ongoing military activity and related damage to transmission infrastructure. Over the weekend, grid disruptions caused fluctuating power outputs and temporary disconnections of power lines at the Khmelnitsky, Rivne, and South Ukraine NPPs. In several instances, units operated at reduced capacity to maintain grid stability and prevent equipment damage. IAEA teams on site continue to monitor conditions closely and maintain regular communication with plant operators.

“Persistent instability in Ukraine’s electrical grid continues to undermine nuclear safety,” Director General Grossi said. “Although backup systems have worked as designed, repeated losses of off-site power and limited redundancy increase risk and reinforce the need for reliable external power.”

Over the past two weeks, an IAEA team assessing the status of electrical substations critical for nuclear safety and security in Ukraine confirmed that the grid situation is now in its worst condition since the Agency began monitoring substations in September 2024.

The latest mission, conducted from 1 to 12 December 2025, involved visits to more than ten substations – critical for ensuring nuclear safety and security by providing the electricity all NPPs need for reactor cooling and other safety systems. The objective of the mission was to assess damage, review repair efforts, and identify practical steps to strengthen the resilience of off-site power supplies to the country’s NPPs.

Assessing conditions against the Seven Indispensable Pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during an armed conflict, the team confirmed that continued and deliberate attacks on critical grid infrastructure have caused cumulative impacts on NPP operations and staff conditions. Power cuts are affecting cities where plant personnel live, undermining living conditions and directly impacting staff through disruptions to electricity, heating, and water supply.

“The strikes on Ukraine’s electrical grid appear coordinated to maximize disruption, and their frequency and scope underscore that the overall stability of the grid is deteriorating rather than improving,” said Director General Grossi. “I repeat my call for maximum military restraint. No one wants, or benefits from, a nuclear accident” Director General Grossi added.

The IAEA has continued to deliver on its comprehensive programme of assistance to help Ukraine maintain nuclear safety and security. Five new deliveries have been made, bringing the total to 194 since the start of the conflict. 

Under the medical assistance programme, the medical unit at Khmelnitsky NPP received essential medications, while the Kherson Regional Infectious Diseases Hospital was provided with a digital colour Doppler ultrasound system within the framework of the IAEA Support and Assistance Mission to the Kherson Oblast (ISAMKO). Additionally, equipment and spare parts intended to support the safe operation of the South Ukraine NPP by maintaining a reliable power supply were delivered to the Joint Stock Company “Mykolaivoblenergo.” The Chornobyl NPP also received equipment to enhance its physical protection measures at the site. 

The deliveries were supported with funding from Austria, the European Union, France, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. 

2025 Wrapped: IAEA’s Most-Read Nuclear Explainers

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Emma Midgley, IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication

In 2025, IAEA website audiences were drawn in large numbers to our visual science explainers and features on the safe and secure uses of nuclear energy, nuclear science and technology.

1. Understanding Nuclear Energy

One of the IAEA’s most popular articles in 2025 was the explainer on What is Nuclear Energy?  Readers learned about how splitting atoms generates clean power without emitting greenhouse gases. 

Most nuclear reactors in operation today are fuelled by uranium. Read the What is Uranium? explainer to find out where uranium comes from, how it is processed and why a chicken-egg sized amount of uranium fuel provides as much energy as 88 tonnes of coal.  

2. New Advances in Nuclear Technology

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are making headlines as a way of powering data centres for artificial intelligence, and our explainer on these and other promising advanced nuclear reactors, were among the most read of 2025.

The Molten Salt Reactors explainer showed how passive safety systems in these types of reactors could enhance the safety of nuclear power plants and revealed that these reactors are being designed to use new types of fuels, such as thorium.

3. Nuclear Fusion: Closer to Reality?

Nuclear fusion remains the ultimate energy goal, providing potentially limitless clean energy without greenhouse gases. Our What is Nuclear Fusion? explainer continued to rank among the most popular website content in 2025. Readers found out more about how fusion is developing around the world and how it differs from nuclear fission, which powers conventional reactors.

4. Peaceful Uses Beyond Energy

Beyond energy, the IAEA helps countries to benefit from nuclear science and technology in medicine, agriculture and food. Our isotopes explainer revealed how scientists use isotopes to find out the age and quality of water resources around the world and to track environmental pollution.  The radiopharmaceuticals explainer delved into how radioisotopes can be used to treat or diagnose cancer and heart disease. And our cyclotron explainer showed how these important radioisotopes are produced. 

Nuclear techniques can also bolster food security and sustainable agriculture as the IAEA’s explainers on food irradiation and the role of nuclear techniques in combatting soil erosion show. 

5. Nuclear Safety and Security

Nuclear safety and security, which enables people to benefit from nuclear technology while protecting them and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation, are some of the most important areas of the IAEA’s work. In 2025, the What is Radiation? explainer helped readers understand the different types of radiation, its beneficial uses in health, energy, agriculture and industry and the safety measures that can protect people from harmful exposure to ionizing radiation. 

For those wanting to dive deeper, an explainer on the universal radiation symbol highlighted how international standardization leads to greater public awareness of the risks of ionizing radiation, reducing the risk of accidental exposure.

6. A Two Billion Year Old Nuclear Reactor

Finally, the story of Oklo, a natural nuclear reactor in Gabon, captured the imaginations of many readers. It shows that nuclear reactions occurred naturally in uranium deposits in western Equatorial Africa, long before the first dinosaurs appeared. The IAEA article Meet Oklo: Earth’s Two-Billion-Year-Old Natural Reactor will tell you more.

The popularity of these explainers shows a world eager to understand nuclear science and technology and benefit from clean energy, better health, enhanced agriculture, innovation and more. 

Find more ‘Nuclear Explained’ articles, as well as videos and podcasts in this series, here.  

Samples of Oklo donated to Vienna’s Natural History Museum. (Photo: Ludovic Ferrière/Natural History Museum).

Related resources

Princess Maxima Center Designated as IAEA Collaborating Centre in Paediatric Oncology

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Monika Shifotoka, IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication

The IAEA has designated the Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology as a Collaborating Centre to strengthen childhood cancer care worldwide.

With the presence of Her Majesty Queen Máxima, the IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi signed today in Utrecht, The Netherlands, a new partnership agreement with Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology to strengthen practical knowledge on the use of radiotherapy for treating children with cancer. 

“It is our mission to reduce the big disparities in radiotherapy for children around the world; knowledge and training are a key part of that,” said Mr. Grossi. “I am very pleased that paediatric radiotherapy teams will be able to take what they have learned at the Princess Máxima Center back to colleagues in their home countries, and ultimately to the children and families who count on them.”

The designation will advance education, training and quality assurance in paediatric radiation oncology, medical physics and nutrition, supporting the IAEA’s Human Health Programme and its Rays of Hope initiative. The IAEA will work closely with the Center in improving radiotherapy treatment for children with cancer.

Prof. Dr. Rob Pieters, Chief Máxima International at the Princess Máxima Center said “We are grateful to the IAEA for giving us the opportunity to provide radiotherapy oncologists the training that will help them treat children in their own countries more safely and effectively. In addition, it enables us to further advance our knowledge of childhood cancer by working more closely with hospitals in these regions. In this way, it substantially contributes to our center’s mission which is shared by pediatric oncologists worldwide: curing every child with cancer, with the best possible quality of life. Everywhere.” 

Expanding Access to Childhood Cancer Care

As an IAEA Collaborating Centre, the Princess Máxima Center will contribute expert support to IAEA technical missions, including paediatric radiation oncology quality assurance missions and quality of paediatric oncology practice (QUATRO) audits and assist in developing guidance documents and training materials for radiation oncology, medical physics and nutrition professionals.

By using this opportunity, the IAEA and PMCC will strengthen their joint efforts across Africa, where the support in access to high-quality paediatric cancer is needed the most. “Together, we are coordinating a new partnership in Africa, beginning with Kenya, to strengthen paediatric cancer care. This represents a significant step in translating global excellence into regional impact.” DG Grossi said. 

The centre will also host regional training courses for paediatric radiation oncology teams, starting with the first edition that is ongoing this week in Utrecht. These activities will strengthen capacity in Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, where education and training have been identified as top priorities.

The designation supports the IAEA’s Rays of Hope initiative, which aims to expand access to cancer care for all in low- and middle-income countries by strengthening radiotherapy and related services. By leveraging the expertise of the Princess Máxima Center, the IAEA will accelerate the development of global standards and training programmes, helping countries implement safe, effective and sustainable solutions for childhood cancer treatment.

Building on Existing Collaboration

The designation builds on ongoing collaboration between the IAEA and the Princess Máxima Center since 2023 in paediatric radiation oncology, nutrition and medical physics. Joint activities have included participation in the IAEA regional workshop on paediatric radiotherapy services in Europe and Central Asia, scientific publications and contributions to the development of the IAEA framework for education and training of radiation oncology professionals in childhood cancer.

Driving Industrial Innovation: Brazil’s Mobile Electron Beam Accelerator

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Electron beam treatment of wastewater is highly effective, but still relatively unknown in many industrial sectors. To increase the awareness of this application, Brazil has made the unit mobile, with support from the Republic of Korea. Worldwide, only a handful of transportable e-beam accelerators are in use for industrial applications. The truck-mounted accelerator will be able to visit industrial sites around the country with ease – showcasing how e-beam irradiation can solve wastewater challenges and providing an opportunity for in-person training. The mobile irradiator has already been tested for various applications in chemical, oil, and sanitation sectors, such as São Paulo Sanitation Company and Petrobras. It has also been used for training purposes including with the National Industrial Apprenticeship Service.  

“Together, we developed the mobile unit, which uses nuclear technology — an e-beam accelerator — to degrade organic compounds in wastewater,” said Wilson Calvo, Director of Research and Development, CNEN. “The main proposal is to reuse this water, for example from clothing production or industrial applications,” he said. 

The unit, equipped with a 700 keV, 28.5 mA and 20 kW industrial electron accelerator, was established by the Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN), which is part of CNEN, supported by the IAEA technical cooperation programme, the Brazilian Innovation Agency, the National Research Council and Truckvan. Wastewater flows directly through the unit, where it is irradiated by the e-beam accelerator. This breaks down toxins and makes any additional conventional treatments more efficient. Up to 1000 cubic metres of wastewater can be treated every day.  

IAEA Profile: From Chemistry Labs to Nuclear Security

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Zeinab joined the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA) as a teaching assistant in December 2006 and within two years, became a nuclear safeguards inspector.  

“That was a game changer,” she said. “I moved from pure chemistry to nuclear science, which opened an entirely new world for me.”  

In 2014, Zeinab became Head of the Nuclear Security Administration at the EAEA . “I was the first and only woman in that position,” she recalled. “It was not easy, but every obstacle became another reason to work harder.” 

Zeinab’s leadership shaped Egypt’s national framework for nuclear security and helped build technical capacity for nuclear security at the national level. Her expertise soon earned international recognition.  Over the years, she collaborated extensively with the IAEA, supporting training courses across the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. 

In 2021, she joined the IAEA’s Division of Nuclear Security — a milestone she considers a defining point in her career. “When I was selected by the IAEA, it felt like the culmination of fifteen years of effort,” she said. 

At the IAEA, Zeinab supports countries to enhance their nuclear security regimes and develop sustainable capacity building programmes. She sees herself as both a scientist and a nuclear security specialist.  

“Being a professor is something I’ve never left behind,” she said. “My scientific background keeps me grounded and connected to my roots.”  

Infographic Contest on the Safe and Secure Transport of Nuclear and Radioactive Material

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Vasiliki Tafili, IAEA Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

Ahead of the International Conference for the Safe and Secure Transport of Nuclear and Radioactive Material which will take place in Vienna, Austria from 23 to 27 March 2026, the IAEA has launched an infographic design contest for early career professionals and students aged 18 to 35.  

The contest aims to raise awareness about the safety and security of transport of nuclear and radioactive material. Interested participants should submit their entries by 16 January 2026.  

All submissions should cover topics within the conference’s thematic scope and may draw upon relevant IAEA Safety Standards and Nuclear Security Series publications.  

“We welcome submissions that will address aspects of transport on nuclear and radioactive material in a clear and visually engaging way,” said Shazia Fayyaz, one of the scientific secretaries and Head of the IAEA Transport Safety Unit in the Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety. “The goal is to make technical concepts accessible and compelling, while highlighting the importance of safety and security in transport.” 

Submissions will be judged for their clarity and innovation, while the overall impact and effectiveness in communicating transport of nuclear and radioactive material concepts are also among the evaluation criteria.  

“The challenge lies in making complex transport concepts more readily understood by non-expert audiences,” said Robert Officer, the other scientific secretary of the conference and Head of the IAEA Transport Security Unit in the Division of Nuclear Security. “We are looking for originality and creativity, without compromising technical accuracy,” he added.  

The top three winners will be invited to attend the conference and have their infographics displayed and featured by the IAEA. Additional recognition for other finalists includes visibility across the IAEA’s communication platforms and the Nuclear Young Generation (UN-NYG) networks. 

How to Participate 

Participants are required to send a single infographic by email by 16 January 2026 and must complete the online form.

The winners will be notified by early February 2026.  

For more information, visit the conference page.  

Update 332 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Persistent instability in Ukraine’s electrical grid continues to challenge nuclear safety during the military conflict, at times causing disruptions in the availability of off-site power for the country’s main nuclear sites, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today. 

Early in the morning of 6 December, at 3:21am, the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) suffered yet another loss of all off-site power – its 11th during the conflict – lasting for about half an hour when both of its remaining power lines were disconnected within 20 minutes of one another. 

At the time of the event, all available emergency diesel generators (EDGs) on site automatically started up to generate the electricity the plant needs to operate the water pumps used for reactor cooling and for other essential nuclear safety and security functions. 

“While the emergency backup system functioned as designed, repeated loss of off-site power events increases operational stress and highlights the importance of maintaining reliable off-site power,” Director General Grossi said.

While the 330 kilovolt (kV) Ferosplavna-1 line was reconnected to the ZNPP after just 29 minutes, the 750 kV Dniprovska main power line was restored nine hours later. Earlier in the autumn, the ZNPP went for one month without any off-site power, the longest such event during the conflict. 

Elsewhere in Ukraine, widespread military activities last Saturday also affected the grid and external power supplies to the three operating nuclear power plants (NPPs), prompting them to reduce the output of several reactors. 

“These disruptions have resulted in fluctuating power outputs, temporary disconnections, and forced outages at some units. In several cases, units were taken off-line or operated at reduced capacity to maintain grid balance and prevent equipment damage following sudden protection actuations,” Director General Grossi said.

“In terms of nuclear safety and security, the fragile grid and power situation remains one of the biggest challenges. As the Seven Indispensable Pillars for ensuring nuclear safety and security during an armed conflict clearly state: there must be a secure off-site power supply from the grid for all nuclear sites. All too often, this is far from the reality that our experts see on the ground,” he said.

On a more positive note, the operating NPPs’ nuclear safety systems have continued to function as intended, and emergency power supplies remain fully available. The IAEA teams based at Ukraine’s nuclear sites continue to monitor conditions closely and maintain communication with operators.

As part of the IAEA’s ongoing efforts to help prevent a nuclear accident during the conflict, an IAEA team is this month visiting more than 10 electrical substations, following recent attacks targeting key energy infrastructure. The 1-12 December mission is assessing the damage, reviewing repair efforts, and identifying practical steps to strengthen the resilience of off-site power supplies to the country’s NPPs. 

At the ZNPP on 5 December, the IAEA team observed an EDG test. At the full-load stage during the test, a smoke cloud and flames of up to a few metres high were suddenly seen shooting up from the EDG building’s exhaust chimney. The flames subsided after one-two minutes. The IAEA team was informed that the fire was caused by the ignition of accumulated soot in the exhaust system, that had been piled up during its prolonged operation during the October-November loss of off-site power event. After test completion, the team was informed by the ZNPP that it had been successful and that the EDG was put back to standby mode. The IAEA team later visited the EDG building and did not notice any issues with respect to nuclear safety. 

As part of the IAEA’s comprehensive programme of assistance, the physical protection department of Ukraine’s Central Enterprise for Radioactive Waste Management received four all-terrain vehicles. The delivery was funded by the United Kingdom. 

IAEA reviews Viet Nam’s nuclear power infrastructure development

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Viet Nam has taken important actions towards adding nuclear power to its energy mix, including in developing the necessary infrastructure for a safe and sustainable nuclear power programme, according to an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) review mission.

An IAEA team of experts yesterday concluded an 11-day mission to Viet Nam to review its infrastructure development for the Ninh Thuan Nuclear Power Project, which had been stopped in 2016. In 2024, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Viet Nam decided to restart the project and the National Assembly of Viet Nam authorized the Government to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation.

The establishment of nuclear power is an objective of the Revised National Power Development Plan for the period 2021-2030, which considers nuclear power as key for diversifying the national energy mix and strengthening energy security amidst Viet Nam’s steadily rising energy demand and economic growth in recent years.  The plan envisages the commissioning of two nuclear power plants, Ninh Thuan 1 and Ninh Thuan 2, during the 2030–2035 period, with a total capacity of 4,000–6,400 MW.

The Phase 2 Integrated Nuclear Infrastructure Review (INIR) was carried out from 1 to 11 December 2025, at the invitation of the Government of Viet Nam and hosted by the Ministry of Science and Technology. The team reviewed the status of 19 nuclear infrastructure issues using the IAEA evaluation methodology for Phase 2 of the Milestones Approach, which evaluates the readiness of a country to invite bids or negotiate a contract for the first nuclear power plant. The team comprised of three experts from Brazil, Bulgaria and United Kingdom, as well as seven IAEA staff. 

The team identified good practices in government-enabling mechanisms for financing and procurement, as well as in leveraging existing expertise in environmental monitoring for nuclear projects, which could benefit other countries developing nuclear power.

“Viet Nam shows strong government commitment to reviving its nuclear power programme,” said mission team leader Eric Mathet, Operational Lead of the IAEA Nuclear Infrastructure Development Section. “The country is lying the groundwork for project delivery and is mobilising resources. The INIR mission will support the development of a comprehensive action plan for infrastructure development.” 

The team also made recommendations and suggestions aimed at assisting Viet Nam in making further progress in the development of its nuclear infrastructure and its readiness to build the first nuclear power plant in the country. 

The team also highlighted areas where further actions would benefit Viet Nam, including strengthening the legal and regulatory framework for the nuclear power programme, implementing plans to reinforce its human resource capacities across all areas, completing the preparatory work required for the contracting and construction stages, consolidating national strategies for the nuclear fuel cycle and radioactive waste management, and increasing the effectiveness of coordination mechanisms among all stakeholders.

“The valuable and timely support of the IAEA is highly appreciated as well as the experience and companionship of experts which are of special importance to Vietnam in the process of completing the nuclear power infrastructure according to international standards and IAEA guidelines,” said Deputy Minister of Science and Technology of Vietnam Le Xuan Dinh

The preliminary draft INIR report was delivered during the closing session of the mission by Aline Des Cloizeaux, Director, IAEA Division of Nuclear Power.

“The team concluded that Viet Nam has taken major steps to restart and accelerate the implementation of the Ninh Thuan Nuclear Power Project and the development of the required infrastructure. In 2025, Viet Nam enacted a new Atomic Energy Law and adopted special mechanisms to facilitate financial and contractual arrangements for the nuclear power plants.” she said during the presentation of the report in Hanoi.

Based on the outcomes of the INIR mission, the IAEA and Viet Nam will update their Integrated Workplan to continue providing coordinated support in line with the future development of the country’s nuclear power programme.

Viet Nam has already hosted INIR missions in the past, in 2009, 2012 and 2014. 

About INIR Missions

INIR missions are based on the IAEA Milestones Approach, with its 19 infrastructure issues, three phases (consider, prepare and construct) and three milestones (decide, contract and commission/operate). INIR missions enable IAEA Member State representatives to have in-depth discussions with international experts about experiences and best practices in different countries.

In developing its recommendations, the INIR team considers the comments made by the relevant national organizations. Implementation of any of the team’s recommendations and suggestions is at the discretion of the Member State requesting the mission. The results of the INIR mission are expected to help the Member State develop an action plan to fill any gaps, which in turn will help the development of the national nuclear infrastructure.

In Fukushima’s Evacuated Zone, International Experts Train for Effective Nuclear Emergency Response

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

Nayana Jayarajan, IAEA Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

Workshop participants receive guidance on field sampling techniques in a formerly inhabited area. (Photo: IAEA).

In Fukushima Prefecture, the region which experienced a nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in 2011, emergency response specialists from Ukraine, Southeast Asia and Australia converged for a week-long IAEA technical training on radiological emergency monitoring.  

The workshop, funded by Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of its support to Ukraine, focused on strengthening international cooperation and prioritized Ukrainian participation, reflecting the country’s need for advanced emergency preparedness and response.  The IAEA Response and Assistance Network (RANET) Capacity Building Centre carried out the training at the Fukushima Prefectural Centre for Environmental Creation from 20 to 24 October 2025. 

“Japan’s experience in emergency response is not just a national asset—it’s a global resource,” said Karine Herviou, IAEA Deputy Director General and Head of the Department of Nuclear Safety and Security. “By sharing lessons learned in Fukushima Daiichi, we help build resilience far beyond Japan’s borders.” 

“Through the IAEA initiatives, Japan has been providing support to Ukraine, which is under threat to nuclear safety. We hope that this workshop will help strengthen Ukraine’s response capabilities in nuclear and radiological emergencies,” said Kenichiro Tanaka, Director of the International Nuclear Cooperation Division in Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

Radiation Monitoring and Elemental Sampling

Participants received a blend of theoretical instruction and hands-on fieldwork in some of Fukushima’s most affected areas. This included radiation monitoring and environmental sampling practice at sites like the former Kumamachi Elementary School in Okuma Town and Yasuragi-Sou, a community home for the elderly in Namie Town — both uninhabited since the disaster. Guided by trainers from the IAEA and Australia’s Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, attendees used backpack survey systems, gamma spectrometers and contamination monitors to collect and interpret data under real-world conditions.

IAEA expert prepares field monitoring equipment for gamma spectroscopy measurements during the exercise. (Photo: IAEA).

Training in a Real World Environment

A central feature of the training was the use of the IAEA’s International Radiation Monitoring Information System. Participants uploaded field data to a secure training platform, learning how to visualize and analyse results for rapid decision-making during a nuclear or radiological emergency. 

“Training in a real-world environment — where radiation levels can be measured and emergency responses simulated — equips participants with skills they cannot acquire in a purely theoretical setting,” said Herviou. “This approach is especially valuable for countries like Ukraine, where the ability to respond quickly and effectively to radiological incidents is critical.” 

The workshop’s international roster included participants from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Ukraine, underscoring the IAEA’s commitment to capacity building across regions. Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a longstanding partner in the IAEA’s emergency preparedness activities, continues to support these efforts, ensuring that the lessons of Fukushima inform global standards and practices. 

Looking ahead, the IAEA plans further workshops in Japan, such as the RANET Joint Assistance Team Exercise and a workshop on public communication during nuclear emergencies, which includes lessons on mitigating misinformation and disinformation.  

“The partnership between the IAEA, Japan and participating countries is vital for strengthening global nuclear safety,” Herviou said. “By training together in Fukushima, we are preparing for challenges that know no borders.” 

Participants collect environmental samples as part of hands-on radiological monitoring training. (Photo: IAEA).

Related resources

IAEA Completes Integrated Safety Assessment for Research Reactors Follow-Up Mission in Belgium

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

The IAEA mission team meet with experts during the IAEA Integrated Safety Assessment of Research Reactors mission. (Credit: IAEA)

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team of experts observed enhanced safety since a previous review mission in 2023  at the Belgian Research Reactor 2 (BR2). The team also found the need to further address recommendations related to safety analysis and operational limits and conditions. 

The four-day Integrated Safety Assessment for Research Reactors (INSARR) follow-up mission to BR2 was requested by the national regulatory body, Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC), and was hosted by the operating organization, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN). The mission team comprised two experts from Argentina and Czech Republic, as well as one IAEA official. The team visited the research reactor and associated facilities while meeting with SCK•CEN staff and FANC officials to assess the implemented safety actions since the previous INSARR mission.  

BR2 is one of three operating research reactors at the SCK•CEN in Mol, in northeast Belgium. Operating since 1961, BR2 is one of the world’s most powerful research reactors, supplying the world with radioisotopes for medical purposes, including for cancer therapy and medical imaging. It also produces radioisotopes for industrial purposes and develops doped silicon, which forms a semiconductor material that can be found in hybrid cars, and high-speed trains as well as in solar and wind farms. BR2 performs periodic safety reviews every ten years, and is currently undergoing one that is due to be finalized next year. 

“SCK•CEN has addressed the majority of the review recommendations made in 2023 and accomplished considerable safety enhancements,” said Kaichao Sun, mission team leader and Nuclear Safety Officer at the IAEA. “Further efforts are needed to finalize the remaining actions and to achieve the highest level of safety for the ongoing periodic safety review.” 

The mission team assessed that SCK•CEN has strengthened the organizational effectiveness and operational programmes through: 

  • Completion of the SCK•CEN restructuring by establishing a BR2 institute with adequate human and financial resources;
  • Enhancement of safety culture by including mandatory leadership development training for managerial roles across the operating organization;
  • Establishment of a verification process by authorized personnel to enhance the effectiveness of reactor operation and maintenance. 

The findings from the mission indicate the need for further safety improvements in areas that are related to: 

  • Update of the BR2 safety analysis and the acceptance criteria in the frame of the periodic safety review; 
  • Advancement of operational limits and conditions in accordance with the IAEA safety standards. 

“We work every day to continuously improve the safety performance of our infrastructure and organization. It is rewarding to see our efforts paying off”, said Steven Van Dyck, Director of BR2. He highly appreciated the open and constructive discussions with the IAEA review team in this follow-up mission. “We’re thankful for their expertise and guidance that help us move forward and enables us to keep delivering for millions of patients worldwide.”  

The mission team made a new recommendation on specifying the applicability of the BR2 safety limits as part of the ongoing periodic safety review. The IAEA understands that FANC intends to make the results of this mission publicly available on their website. 

Background 

INSARR missions are an IAEA peer review service, conducted at the request of a Member State, to assess and evaluate the safety of research reactors based on IAEA Safety Standards. Follow-up missions are standard components of the INSARR programme and are typically conducted within two years of the initial mission. General information about INSARR missions can be found on the IAEA Website

The IAEA Safety Standards provide a robust framework of fundamental principles, requirements, and guidance to ensure safety. They reflect an international consensus and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.